197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12321843)
1. No over-the-counter OCs, say family planners.
Contracept Technol Update; 1998 Oct; 19(10):128. PubMed ID: 12321843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pill won't budge from no. 1 spot: half of women leave exams with OCs.
Contracept Technol Update; 2000 Sep; 21(9):101-4. PubMed ID: 12296239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Young teens are safe on pills but need counseling, follow-up.
Contracept Technol Update; 1987 Sep; 8(9):120-2. PubMed ID: 12268914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Emergency contraception: not a secret any more.
Contracept Technol Update; 1998 Oct; 19(10):136-8. PubMed ID: 12321845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pills remain the top choice among reversible contraceptive options.
Contracept Technol Update; 1999 Sep; 20(9):97-101. PubMed ID: 12290380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Providers make EC readily available.
Contracept Technol Update; 2000 Sep; 21(9):112-3. PubMed ID: 12296244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should oral contraceptives be sold over-the-counter?
Stone SC
Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(2):27-32. PubMed ID: 12319537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pill power: oral contraceptives hold top spot in family planning arsenal.
Contracept Technol Update; 1998 Oct; 19(10):125-7. PubMed ID: 12321842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On 7/7/7 preferred for new patients by 47% of respondents.
Contracept Technol Update; 1986 Sep; 7(9):101-4. PubMed ID: 12268337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experts debate pill switching to combat noncompliance. Special report: annual pill survey.
Contracept Technol Update; 1992 Oct; 13(10):149-53. PubMed ID: 12344722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Approaches vary in managing the over-40 pill patient.
Contracept Technol Update; 1988 Sep; 9(9):105-7. PubMed ID: 12342192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Most providers comfortable giving OCs to women over age 40. Special report: annual pill survey.
Contracept Technol Update; 1992 Oct; 13(10):158-9. PubMed ID: 12344725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychiatrically impaired patients often exposed to pregnancy risk.
Neinstein LS; Katz B
Contracept Technol Update; 1985 Jun; 6(6):88-90. PubMed ID: 12313658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lack of data on morning after pill confounds clinicians.
Contracept Technol Update; 1987 Nov; 8(11):137-40. PubMed ID: 12269058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Examine use of low- and lower-dose OCs.
Contracept Technol Update; 2000 Jun; 21(6):72-3. PubMed ID: 12295925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Might generic OCs create contraceptive price war?
Contracept Technol Update; 1987 Feb; 8(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 12314977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How to use OCs? Readers offer insights.
Contracept Technol Update; 1999 Sep; 20(9):105-6. PubMed ID: 12290377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experts recommend ways to combat noncompliance. Special report: annual pill survey.
Contracept Technol Update; 1992 Oct; 13(10):156-8. PubMed ID: 12344724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revised oral contraceptive labeling: FDA approves recommendation allowing delay of pelvic exam.
Contracept Rep; 1993 Nov; 4(5):4-7. PubMed ID: 12287403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Norplant insertions, removals remain low.
Contracept Technol Update; 2000 Sep; 21(9):105. PubMed ID: 12296240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
