BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 123222)

  • 1. SSA-Connecticut hospital incentive reimbursement experiment cost evaluation.
    Elnicki RA
    Inquiry; 1975 Mar; 12(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 123222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective reimbursement of hospitals.
    Dowling WL
    Inquiry; 1974 Sep; 11(3):163-80. PubMed ID: 4278236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective rate reimbursement and cost containment: formula reimbursement in New York.
    Berry RE
    Inquiry; 1976 Sep; 13(3):288-301. PubMed ID: 135735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incentive reimbursement: the carrot is there, but the hospitals won't bite.
    Mod Hosp; 1972 Oct; 119(4):79-82. PubMed ID: 5074512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incentive reimbursement: California: lesson in belt-tightening.
    Mod Hosp; 1972 Oct; 119(4):85-6. PubMed ID: 5074514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anesthesia costs.
    Siker ES; Stewart WD; Edwards JW
    Clin Anesth; 1974; 10(3):357-70. PubMed ID: 4613520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost containment in the health care industry.
    Cleverley WO
    Top Health Care Financ; 1977; 3(3):1-17. PubMed ID: 403635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laminar airflow rooms.
    Drazen EC; Levine AS
    Hospitals; 1974 Jan; 48(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 4588963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incentive reimbursement experiment.
    May DP
    Hospitals; 1971 Oct; 45(19):49-53. PubMed ID: 5005714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Information needs for hospital rate setting.
    Bauer KG
    Top Health Care Financ; 1976; 3(2):131-56. PubMed ID: 1006669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reimbursement problems of Catholic hospitals.
    Blaes SM
    Hosp Prog; 1975 Mar; 56(3):46-50, 54. PubMed ID: 1092604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health insurance for abortion costs: a survey.
    Muller CF
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1970 Oct; 2(4):12-20. PubMed ID: 5538312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Annual administrative reviews. Financial constraints.
    Dowling WL
    Hospitals; 1974 Apr; 48(7):113-6. PubMed ID: 4592923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Results of prospective reimbursement.
    Gaus CR; Hellinger FJ
    Top Health Care Financ; 1976; 3(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 1006672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reimbursement alternatives for home health care.
    Shuman LJ; Wolfe H; Whetsell GW; Huber GA
    Inquiry; 1976 Sep; 13(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 135734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Connecticut: reward system doesn't work.
    May DP
    Mod Hosp; 1972 Oct; 119(4):83-4. PubMed ID: 5074513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 93 WAYS HOSPITALS ARE CUTTING COSTS.
    FOSTER JT
    Mod Hosp; 1964 Apr; 102():96-102 PASSIM. PubMed ID: 14138635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hospitals and the environment: biological interrelationships.
    Engley FB
    Hospitals; 1972 Oct; 46(20):83-5 passim. PubMed ID: 5074259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Financial management.
    Harvey JD
    Hospitals; 1972 Apr; 46(7):87-91. PubMed ID: 4552335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incentive reimbursement plans offer a variety of approaches to cost control.
    Wolkstein I
    Hospitals; 1969 Jun; 43(12):63-7. PubMed ID: 5794203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.