402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12322840)
1. The Thai logarithmic visual acuity chart.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 12322840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
Laidlaw DA; Tailor V; Shah N; Atamian S; Harcourt C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Repeatability and reliability of the visual acuity examination on logMAR ETDRS and Snellen chart].
Veselý P; Synek S
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 May; 68(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 22913870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of the threshold interpolation and whole-line method on logMAR chart and Snellen chart for visual acuity testing].
Veselý P; Ventruba J
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Oct; 65(5):191-4. PubMed ID: 20052823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of visual acuity assessment in normal and low visual acuity.
Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
Strabismus; 2007; 15(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 17523039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual acuity scored by the letter-by-letter or probit methods has lower retest variability than the line assignment method.
Vanden Bosch ME; Wall M
Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 3)():411-7. PubMed ID: 9373488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of dynamic visual acuity in subjects with unilateral vestibular hypofunction.
Dannenbaum E; Paquet N; Chilingaryan G; Fung J
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):368-72. PubMed ID: 19318888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New visual acuity chart: modification for clinical practice and research.
Pisarnkorskul P; Singhkuna L
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Mar; 86(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 12757065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized repeating and averaging improve the test-retest variability of ETDRS visual acuity measurements: implications for sensitivity and specificity.
Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Shah SP; Sivasubramaniam S; Bunce C; Cousens S
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Dec; 52(13):9397-402. PubMed ID: 22003109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of letter separation on computerised visual acuity measurements: comparison with the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Brown G; Robson C
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 20444125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A modified ETDRS visual acuity chart for European-wide use.
Plainis S; Tzatzala P; Orphanos Y; Tsilimbaris MK
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):647-53. PubMed ID: 17632314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Construction and validation of a Tamil logMAR chart.
Varadharajan S; Srinivasan K; Kumaresan B
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Sep; 29(5):526-534. PubMed ID: 19689549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ETDRS-fast: implementing psychophysical adaptive methods to standardized visual acuity measurement with ETDRS charts.
Camparini M; Cassinari P; Ferrigno L; Macaluso C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 May; 42(6):1226-31. PubMed ID: 11328731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases].
Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Oct; 228(10):864-7. PubMed ID: 21997822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visual acuity assessment in population-based surveys.
Bourne RR; Rosser DA; Sukudom P; Dineen B; Laidlaw DA; Johnson GJ; Murdoch IE
Eye (Lond); 2003 Aug; 17(6):754-8. PubMed ID: 12928690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing LEA numbers low vision book and Feinbloom visual acuity charts.
Hardgrave N; Hatley J; Lewerenz D
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1611-8. PubMed ID: 23026789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A new reading chart for simultaneous determination of reading vision and reading speed].
Radner W; Willinger U; Obermayer W; Mudrich C; Velikay-Parel M; Eisenwort B
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Sep; 213(3):174-81. PubMed ID: 9793916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The practical near acuity chart (PNAC) and prediction of visual ability at near.
Wolffsohn JS; Cochrane AL
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Mar; 20(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 10829130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repeatability of an automated Landolt C test, compared with the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart testing.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M; Kunawut C; Masayaanon P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):662-9. PubMed ID: 14516806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device.
Rosser DA; Murdoch IE; Fitzke FW; Laidlaw DA
Eye (Lond); 2003 Aug; 17(6):701-6. PubMed ID: 12928680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
