BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12324513)

  • 21. Analysis of biopsy outcome after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer using dose-distribution variables and tumor control probability models.
    Levegrün S; Jackson A; Zelefsky MJ; Venkatraman ES; Skwarchuk MW; Schlegel W; Fuks Z; Leibel SA; Ling CC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jul; 47(5):1245-60. PubMed ID: 10889378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A [-2]proPSA-based artificial neural network significantly improves differentiation between prostate cancer and benign prostatic diseases.
    Stephan C; Kahrs AM; Cammann H; Lein M; Schrader M; Deger S; Miller K; Jung K
    Prostate; 2009 Feb; 69(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 18942119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of predictive accuracy for pathologically organ confined clinical stage T1c prostate cancer using human glandular kallikrein 2 and prostate specific antigen combined with clinical stage and Gleason grade.
    Haese A; Vaisanen V; Lilja H; Kattan MW; Rittenhouse HG; Pettersson K; Chan DW; Huland H; Sokoll LJ; Partin AW
    J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):752-6. PubMed ID: 15711262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and gleason score for predicting prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
    Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1165-70. PubMed ID: 15596191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A neural network predicts progression for men with gleason score 3+4 versus 4+3 tumors after radical prostatectomy.
    Han M; Snow PB; Epstein JI; Chan TY; Jones KA; Walsh PC; Partin AW
    Urology; 2000 Dec; 56(6):994-9. PubMed ID: 11113746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Model to predict prostate biopsy outcome in large screening population with independent validation in referral setting.
    Porter CR; Gamito EJ; Crawford ED; Bartsch G; Presti JC; Tewari A; O'Donnell C
    Urology; 2005 May; 65(5):937-41. PubMed ID: 15882727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge.
    Veltri RW; Miller MC; Mangold LA; O'Dowd GJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 12050500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The 4Kscore Predicts the Grade and Stage of Prostate Cancer in the Radical Prostatectomy Specimen: Results from a Multi-institutional Prospective Trial.
    Punnen S; Nahar B; Prakash NS; Sjoberg DD; Zappala SM; Parekh DJ
    Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Feb; 3(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 28720374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Artificial neural network model to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
    Porter C; O'Donnell C; Crawford ED; Gamito EJ; Errejon A; Genega E; Sotelo T; Tewari A
    Mol Urol; 2001; 5(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 11790277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update.
    Partin AW; Kattan MW; Subong EN; Walsh PC; Wojno KJ; Oesterling JE; Scardino PT; Pearson JD
    JAMA; 1997 May; 277(18):1445-51. PubMed ID: 9145716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A mathematical theory of shape and neuro-fuzzy methodology-based diagnostic analysis: a comparative study on early detection and treatment planning of brain cancer.
    Kar S; Majumder DD
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2017 Aug; 22(4):667-681. PubMed ID: 28321787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prediction by quantitative histology of pathological stage in prostate cancer.
    Pepe P; Galia A; Fraggetta F; Grasso G; Allegro R; Aragona F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2005 Apr; 31(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15780569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An artificial neural network to predict the outcome of repeat prostate biopsies.
    Remzi M; Anagnostou T; Ravery V; Zlotta A; Stephan C; Marberger M; Djavan B
    Urology; 2003 Sep; 62(3):456-60. PubMed ID: 12946746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
    Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can Radiologic Staging With Multiparametric MRI Enhance the Accuracy of the Partin Tables in Predicting Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer?
    Gupta RT; Brown AF; Silverman RK; Tay KJ; Madden JF; George DJ; Polascik TJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 27064383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identification of patients with low-risk for aneuploidy: comparative discriminatory models using linear and machine-learning classifiers in prostate cancer.
    Venkataraman G; Heinze G; Holmes EW; Ananthanarayanan V; Bostwick DG; Paner GP; Bradford-De La garza CM; Brown HG; Flanigan RC; Wojcik EM
    Prostate; 2007 Oct; 67(14):1524-36. PubMed ID: 17683063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The use of artificial neural network analysis to improve the predictive accuracy of prostate biopsy in the Japanese population.
    Matsui Y; Utsunomiya N; Ichioka K; Ueda N; Yoshimura K; Terai A; Arai Y
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2004 Oct; 34(10):602-7. PubMed ID: 15591458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Identifying the best candidate for radical prostatectomy among patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
    Briganti A; Joniau S; Gontero P; Abdollah F; Passoni NM; Tombal B; Marchioro G; Kneitz B; Walz J; Frohneberg D; Bangma CH; Graefen M; Tizzani A; Frea B; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Spahn M
    Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):584-92. PubMed ID: 22153925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predicting the outcome of prostate biopsy in a racially diverse population: a prospective study.
    Porter CR; O'Donnell C; Crawford ED; Gamito EJ; Sentizimary B; De Rosalia A; Tewari A
    Urology; 2002 Nov; 60(5):831-5. PubMed ID: 12429310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.