These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12324828)

  • 1. The use of forced flexion/extension views in the obtunded trauma patient.
    Griffiths HJ; Wagner J; Anglen J; Bunn P; Metzler M
    Skeletal Radiol; 2002 Oct; 31(10):587-91. PubMed ID: 12324828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of flexion-extension radiographs of the cervical spine in blunt trauma.
    Pollack CV; Hendey GW; Martin DR; Hoffman JR; Mower WR;
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Jul; 38(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 11423804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clearing the cervical spine in critically injured patients: a comprehensive C-spine protocol to avoid unnecessary delays in diagnosis.
    Platzer P; Jaindl M; Thalhammer G; Dittrich S; Wieland T; Vecsei V; Gaebler C
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Dec; 15(12):1801-10. PubMed ID: 16538521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flexion and extension views are not cost-effective in a cervical spine clearance protocol for obtunded trauma patients.
    Anglen J; Metzler M; Bunn P; Griffiths H
    J Trauma; 2002 Jan; 52(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 11791052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clearing the cervical spine in obtunded patients.
    Harris TJ; Blackmore CC; Mirza SK; Jurkovich GJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(14):1547-53. PubMed ID: 18552669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exclusion of unstable cervical spine injury in obtunded patients with blunt trauma: is MR imaging needed when multi-detector row CT findings are normal?
    Hogan GJ; Mirvis SE; Shanmuganathan K; Scalea TM
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 16183927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flexion/extension cervical spine views in blunt cervical trauma.
    Nasir S; Hussain M; Mahmud R
    Chin J Traumatol; 2012; 15(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 22663912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flexion-extension views in the evaluation of cervical-spine injuries.
    Lewis LM; Docherty M; Ruoff BE; Fortney JP; Keltner RA; Britton P
    Ann Emerg Med; 1991 Feb; 20(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 1996789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Upper cervical spine fracture: sources of misdiagnosis].
    Cusmano F; Ferrozzi F; Uccelli M; Bassi S
    Radiol Med; 1999 Oct; 98(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 10615359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of flexion and extension radiographs of the cervical spine to rule out acute instability in patients with negative computed tomography scans.
    Khan SN; Erickson G; Sena MJ; Gupta MC
    J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Jan; 25(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 21085024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective evaluation of a critical care pathway for clearance of the cervical spine using the bolster and active range-of-motion flexion/extension techniques.
    Mauldin JM; Maxwell RA; King SM; Phlegar RF; Gallagher MR; Barker DE; Burns RP
    J Trauma; 2006 Sep; 61(3):679-85. PubMed ID: 16967007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are five-view plain films of the cervical spine unreliable? A prospective evaluation in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status.
    Diaz JJ; Gillman C; Morris JA; May AK; Carrillo YM; Guy J
    J Trauma; 2003 Oct; 55(4):658-63; discussion 663-4. PubMed ID: 14566119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. False-negative plain cervical spine x-rays in blunt trauma.
    Besman A; Kaban J; Jacobs L; Jacobs LM
    Am Surg; 2003 Nov; 69(11):1010-4. PubMed ID: 14627267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of flexion and extension radiographs with computed tomography of the cervical spine in blunt trauma.
    Goodnight TJ; Helmer SD; Dort JM; Nold RJ; Smith RS
    Am Surg; 2008 Sep; 74(9):855-7. PubMed ID: 18807677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utility of flexion-extension radiography for the detection of ligamentous cervical spine injury and its current role in the clearance of the cervical spine.
    Oh JJ; Asha SE
    Emerg Med Australas; 2016 Apr; 28(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 26685877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging in combination with helical computed tomography provides a safe and efficient method of cervical spine clearance in the obtunded trauma patient.
    Stassen NA; Williams VA; Gestring ML; Cheng JD; Bankey PE
    J Trauma; 2006 Jan; 60(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 16456452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How often should computed tomographic scans following cross-table lateral cervical films be performed?
    Suzuki T; Morimura N; Sugiyama M; Kitahara T; Soma K
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2004 Jun; 12(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 15237121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging of the cervical spine in injured patients.
    Quann JT; Sidwell RA
    Surg Clin North Am; 2011 Feb; 91(1):209-16. PubMed ID: 21184910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facilitating cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma.
    Roberge RJ
    Emerg Med Clin North Am; 1991 Nov; 9(4):733-42. PubMed ID: 1915045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The value of skull and cervical spine radiography in patients following blunt head injury].
    Quekel LG; van der Kruijk RA; Hekster RE
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1992 Nov; 136(48):2366-70. PubMed ID: 1461313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.