These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
663 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12334289)
1. The Milwaukee story: a public hospital's resistance to the Supreme Court abortion rulings. Ambrose L Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Aug; 4(4):68-72. PubMed ID: 12334289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Courts rejecting maternal health rational for hospitalization for all mid-trimester abortions. Donovan P Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):91-4. PubMed ID: 12262415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The legal issues surrounding the continued refusal of hospitals to allow abortions. Wasserman R Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Jun; 4(3):50-3. PubMed ID: 12307552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law. Denniston L Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion and Medicaid: courts reject limits on funding medically necessary procedures. Kalivoda P Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Dec; 8(6):80-4. PubMed ID: 12278416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade. Mcfarlane DR Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion foes get turn to ask Supreme Court for constitutional protection. Denniston L Sun; 1994 Apr; ():10A. PubMed ID: 12287661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions. Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. State may require abortion clinics to be licensed. Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 12309469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy. Benshoof J Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Restrictions on Medicaid abortions open to challenge on state constitutional grounds. Klassel D Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):95-8. PubMed ID: 12262416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Supreme Court to decide if minors may consent to abortion, declares Roe and Doe don't protect nonphysicians, upholds jobless pay during pregnancy. Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Dec; 4(6):105-6. PubMed ID: 12258973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis. Peterfy A J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The consequences of abortion legislation. Braude M Women Ther; 1983; 2(2-3):81-90. PubMed ID: 12340335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. From the world beyond Washington. The states and fertility-related laws: an analysis at mid-year. Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1987 Aug; ():4-6. PubMed ID: 12281329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]