1379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12338973)
1. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy.
Benshoof J
Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Supreme Court bars mandatory parental role in minors' abortions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 12278191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive health care and minors' rights.
Paul EW; Klassel D
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(2):20-1. PubMed ID: 12339889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restrictions on Medicaid abortions open to challenge on state constitutional grounds.
Klassel D
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):95-8. PubMed ID: 12262416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. From the world beyond Washington. The states and fertility-related laws: an analysis at mid-year.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1987 Aug; ():4-6. PubMed ID: 12281329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Grant recipients' rights in question.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minors' rights win recognition (in sex-related health care).
Pilpel HF; Paul EW
PP News; 1978; 1(3):3. PubMed ID: 12309011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adolescent autonomy and minors' legal rights: contraception and abortion.
Rodman H; Griffith SB
J Appl Dev Psychol; 1982; 3(4):307-18. PubMed ID: 12266643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Religious freedom and family life: reflections on the right to choose.
Paltrow LM
Conscience; 1985; 6(6):1, 3, 12. PubMed ID: 12178932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. More family planning and abortion services needed.
Gold R
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 12267090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion and Medicaid: courts reject limits on funding medically necessary procedures.
Kalivoda P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Dec; 8(6):80-4. PubMed ID: 12278416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The attempt to break down overseas population assistance: Population Crisis Committee.
Camp SL
Interaction; 1986 Jan; 6(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 12340678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproductive rights in jeopardy. The Supreme Court upholds restrictions on abortion.
Gleeson K
ZPG Report; 1992 Sep; 24(4):7. PubMed ID: 12317715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anti-abortion movement.
Wilson K
Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 12340405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A patchwork of funding sources for Norplant users in the U.S.
Antarsh L
AVSC News; 1992 Sep; 30(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D
J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uniting to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
Lynch D
Sun; 1994 Feb; ():18A. PubMed ID: 12287871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. State legislatures demonstrate continuing interest in fertility-related issues.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Feb; 7(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 12277837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Planned Parenthood continues prescribing birth control for teens.
Contracept Technol Update; 1982 Jul; 3(9):110-2. PubMed ID: 12338301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exporting abortion politics: the battle over international family planning assistance.
Lasher C
Conscience; 1991; 12(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 12178849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
