422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12342192)
21. An update on the pill.
Initiatives Popul; 1983; 7(3):2-15. PubMed ID: 12339841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. ON 7/7/7 is first choice for 60% of CTU survey respondents.
Contracept Technol Update; 1987 Sep; 8(9):109-12. PubMed ID: 12268910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Attitudes, regulations hinder use of the pill.
Townsend S
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1993 Mar; 13(3):6-10. PubMed ID: 12318101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Psychiatrically impaired patients often exposed to pregnancy risk.
Neinstein LS; Katz B
Contracept Technol Update; 1985 Jun; 6(6):88-90. PubMed ID: 12313658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Non-Rx pills not health risks, study finds.
Soc Mark Forum; 1984; 1(4):7. PubMed ID: 12266335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contraception in the later reproductive years: a valid aspect of preventive health care.
Speroff L; Sulak PJ
Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 12288679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Oral contraceptives hold top position as leading choice for women.
Contracept Technol Update; 1997 Nov; 18(11):133-6. PubMed ID: 12292767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Contraception for the diabetic woman].
Arlot S; Mesmacque A; Lalau JD; Quichaud J
Fertil Contracept Sex; 1988 Nov; 16(11):921-6. PubMed ID: 12282829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Nurses, physicians prefer different postpartum prescription practices.
Contracept Technol Update; 1986 Sep; 7(9):108-9. PubMed ID: 12268336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Metabolic risks of oral contraception].
Monier L
Rev Int Pediatr; 1988 Feb; (178):64-5. PubMed ID: 12282576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Contraceptive intention behavior in rural Bangladesh: factors in the diffusion of an innovation.
Paul BK
Econ Geogr; 1990 Apr; 66(2):123-39. PubMed ID: 12283440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Lack of data on morning after pill confounds clinicians.
Contracept Technol Update; 1987 Nov; 8(11):137-40. PubMed ID: 12269058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Revised oral contraceptive labeling: FDA approves recommendation allowing delay of pelvic exam.
Contracept Rep; 1993 Nov; 4(5):4-7. PubMed ID: 12287403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Survey shows practice sites prefer ON 7/7/7 for new patients.
Contracept Technol Update; 1987 Sep; 8(9):113. PubMed ID: 12268911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estrogen dose in oral contraceptives: FDA committee examines safety and utility of 50 mcg estrogen OCs.
Contracept Rep; 1994 Mar; 5(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 12287738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Possible link between long-term oral contraceptive use and cervical cancer].
Perspect Int Planif Fam; 1987; (Spec No):40-1. PubMed ID: 12269054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. FDA panel examines link between breast cancer, pill, says more research needed.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1989 Jan; ():3-4. PubMed ID: 12283353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The pill and blood testing in Africa.
Buekens P
IPPF Med Bull; 1989 Dec; 23(6):4. PubMed ID: 12316118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [The difficulties of contraception: conflicts and paradoxes].
Cribier F
Fertil Contracept Sex; 1988 Jun; 16(6):459-63. PubMed ID: 12315842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Potential advantages of triphasic combined oral contraceptives in the light of recent epidemiological and endocrinometabolic data].
Gaspard U; Dubois M
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1982 Sep; 10(9):551-60. PubMed ID: 12311606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
