475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12343643)
1. Long-acting steroid contraceptive technology.
Grubb G
Health Sex; 1991; 2(1):1-5, 7, 16. PubMed ID: 12343643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The state of the contraceptive art.
Tyrer LB; Duarte J
Plan Parent Rev; 1983; 3(2):5-7. PubMed ID: 12265618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New contraceptives by the year 2000: promise and challenge.
Rinehart W
Asian Pac Popul Programme News; 1984 Dec; 13(4):13-6. PubMed ID: 12313700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contraceptive technologies: how much choice do we really have?
Fishel J
ZPG Report; 1997; 29(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 12293118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Contraceptive development--the view from the U.S.A. in the mid 80s].
Potts M; Siemens A; Burton N
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1986 Mar; 14(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 12268061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contraception in the later reproductive years: a valid aspect of preventive health care.
Speroff L; Sulak PJ
Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 12288679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. IUDs, implants, Depo-Provera have "incredible return on investment".
Contracept Technol Update; 1995 Jul; 16(7):81-4. PubMed ID: 12346506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contraceptive revolution revisited: new arrivals, same old rivals.
Courtney H
ZPG Report; 1993 Aug; 25(4):3. PubMed ID: 12286596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-acting steroids provide new options.
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1988; 9(3):1-3, 7. PubMed ID: 12315656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fertility regulation technology: status and prospects.
Segal SJ; Nordberg OS
Popul Bull; 1977 Mar; 31(6):1-25. PubMed ID: 12335682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Choosing a contraceptive. What's best for you?
Anthony J
Am Health; 1994 Apr; 13(3):68-71. PubMed ID: 12290558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New approaches seek greater safety, appeal.
Blaney CL
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1995 Jun; 15(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 12289831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FDA board investigates Depo-Provera safety.
Contracept Technol Update; 1983 Mar; 4(3):25-7. PubMed ID: 12266161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Depo-Provera: costs eat up clinic contraceptive budgets.
Contracept Technol Update; 1999 Jan; 20(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12349019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Where next with long-acting steroids?
Potts DM; Siemens AJ
IPPF Med Bull; 1984 Jun; 18(3):2-3. PubMed ID: 12266285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The history of research on contraceptive methods in the Dominican Republic].
Alvarez Sanchez F; Brache V
Familia; 1983; 1(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 12178197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which contraceptive methods are suitable for the older woman?
Reid RL
J SOGC; 1993 Oct; 15(8):933-6, 939-44. PubMed ID: 12318531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Depo-Provera highly effective as injectable contraceptive.
Denniston GC
Contracept Technol Update; 1985 Dec; 6(12):167-8. PubMed ID: 12280301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
Forrest JD
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Contraceptive development for the future].
Zatuchni GI
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1984 Jun; 12(6):769-79. PubMed ID: 12313176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
