636 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12343688)
1. For women, abortion can't be the whole story.
Beck J
Sun; 1992 Apr; ():13A. PubMed ID: 12343688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproductive rights on firmer ground with prochoice White House, Congress. Special report -- abortion and the 1992 elections.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Nov; (18):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gag rule provision intact as conferees complete work on HHS funding bill. Abortion funding, parental notice dropped.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Oct; (17):1-2. PubMed ID: 12284472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From the world beyond Washington. The states and fertility-related laws: an analysis at mid-year.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1987 Aug; ():4-6. PubMed ID: 12281329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Veto -- or threat thereof -- prevails over majority as 102nd Congress adjourns.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Oct; (15):2-4. PubMed ID: 12317790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The right-to-life resurgence: recent victories push a struggling movement back to the forefront of the abortion battle.
Diconsiglio JM
Family Plan World; 1992; 2(1):9, 12-4. PubMed ID: 12317130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anti-abortion movement.
Wilson K
Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 12340405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Roe v. Wade. Ardently prochoice.
Baldwin M
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):15-6. PubMed ID: 12178875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A caravan for women's lives.
Bader EJ
Integration; 1990 Apr; (23):38-9. PubMed ID: 12316327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Roe v. Wade. Matters sexual.
Brickner B
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):18-9. PubMed ID: 12178915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Things that make Republican loyalists uneasy in a presidential year. Gagging on the rules.
Goodman E
Sun; 1992 Mar; ():15A. PubMed ID: 12317219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rough road ahead for reproductive rights in GOP-controlled Congress.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Dec; ():1-3. PubMed ID: 12288095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FOCA, funding on center stage to test new dynamic in abortion politics.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jan; (1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attitudes about abortion of women who undergo prenatal diagnosis.
Kolker A; Burke BM; Phillips JU
Res Sociol Health Care; 1991; 9():49-73. PubMed ID: 12317576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
Benshoof J
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy.
Benshoof J
Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinton repeals antiabortion policies as activists map out new strategies.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Feb; (3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Roe v. Wade. My prochoice journey.
Kennedy KR
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):28. PubMed ID: 12178916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. More family planning and abortion services needed.
Gold R
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 12267090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Back to "hell?" The threatening family planning crisis in Poland.
Mrugala G
Plan Parent Eur; 1990 Dec; 19(3):17-8. PubMed ID: 12283769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]