BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

636 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12343688)

  • 21. Out from behind the contraceptive Iron Curtain.
    Jacobson JL
    World Watch; 1990; 3(5):29-34. PubMed ID: 12283401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Roe v. Wade. Wayward women.
    Petchesky R; Joffe C
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):33-4. PubMed ID: 12178888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Future uncertain as Congressional drive to block Title X gag rule fails.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Nov; (18):1-2, 4. PubMed ID: 12317314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The unwanted child.
    Trias M
    Draper Fund Rep; 1982 Dec; (11):8-11. PubMed ID: 12264604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attitudes toward family planning.
    Gille H
    Draper Fund Rep; 1984 Jun; (13):3-5. PubMed ID: 12339637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Uniting to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
    Lynch D
    Sun; 1994 Feb; ():18A. PubMed ID: 12287871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Legislating family relationships.
    Gleeson K
    ZPG Report; 1991 Sep; 23(4):7. PubMed ID: 12284469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contraceptive revolution revisited: new arrivals, same old rivals.
    Courtney H
    ZPG Report; 1993 Aug; 25(4):3. PubMed ID: 12286596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What the U.S. Constitution says. The law and abortion.
    Liben P
    Freedom Rev; 1995; 26(5):20-1. PubMed ID: 12346849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abortion in Latin America is a matter of desperation.
    Martinez D
    Conscience; 1990; 11(1):18. PubMed ID: 12178836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What happens to contraception when anti-abortion laws pass?
    Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Sep; 12(9):143-4. PubMed ID: 12317311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Roe v. Wade, the next twenty-five years.
    Kissling F
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):2-3. PubMed ID: 12178879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Despite majority support, prochoice riders' enactment clouded by veto threats.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Aug; (13-14):4-5. PubMed ID: 12317307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Two steps back: Poland's new abortion law.
    Nowicka W
    Plan Parent Eur; 1993 Jun; 22(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 12287103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exporting abortion politics: the battle over international family planning assistance.
    Lasher C
    Conscience; 1991; 12(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 12178849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Postcoital contraception: a delicate political issue.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1984 Apr; 5(4):41-3. PubMed ID: 12266621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reproductive rights in jeopardy. The Supreme Court upholds restrictions on abortion.
    Gleeson K
    ZPG Report; 1992 Sep; 24(4):7. PubMed ID: 12317715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade.
    Mcfarlane DR
    Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Choice at any cost.
    Jacobson JL
    World Watch; 1988; 1(2):30-8. PubMed ID: 12281497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Abortion: a history.
    Hovey G
    Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):18-21. PubMed ID: 12340403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.