636 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12343688)
41. ARHP launches national campaign to prevent unintended pregnancy.
Pereira A
Health Sex; 1992; 3(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 12285654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A cross-cultural history of abortion.
Shain RN
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 3519038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Population, reproduction and health: notes on the question of a social policy].
Da Rocha MI
Rev Bras Estud Popul; 1988; 5(2):21-33. PubMed ID: 12315874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Study cites unmet world demand for contraceptives.. House panel votes to increase Pop Aid funding, rescind program restrictions.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 May; (8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12316871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Abortion: taking on the hard questions.
Kissling F
Conscience; 1999; 20(3):2-12. PubMed ID: 12178909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Television and contraception.
Klein L
Plan Parent Rev; 1986; 6(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 12340617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Economic woes mean cuts to family planning services.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):104, 109-10. PubMed ID: 12284064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The risks of unwanted pregnancy: a Latin American perspective.
Viel B
IPPF Med Bull; 1989 Feb; 23(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12281957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Early electioneering highlights party differences on key issues of choice.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (12):1-2. PubMed ID: 12344813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Roe v. Wade. Jane's perspective.
Kaplan L
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):27-8. PubMed ID: 12178883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Health benefits of legal abortion: an analysis.
Tyrer LB
Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 12340404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Is anti-abortion movement undermining contraception?
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Sep; 12(9):133-8. PubMed ID: 12317308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The uneasy case for a national law on abortion.
Correia EO
Am Prospect; 1991; (5):84-90. PubMed ID: 12285375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Contraceptive coverage, abortion dominate 1999 state, court activity.
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1999 Jun; 2(3):10-1. PubMed ID: 12295187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The international impact of Roe v. Wade.
Brueggemann I
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):19. PubMed ID: 12178878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. 25 years after Roe: new technological parameters for an old debate.
Cohen SA
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Feb; 1(1):5, 12. PubMed ID: 12321448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Teen pregnancy: progress meets politics.
Saul R
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1999 Jun; 2(3):6-9. PubMed ID: 12295192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Bare court majority reaffirms Roe, but standard for reviewing state laws is relaxed.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (11):1-3. PubMed ID: 12286280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Experts predict increase in overseas abortions, maternal deaths.
Scommegna P
Popul Today; 1996 Apr; 24(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 12290887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Funding for international family planning attacked.
Kaeser L
Contracept Technol Update; 1997 Aug; 18(8):101-3. PubMed ID: 12292727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
