259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12346943)
1. Norplant may be too costly for low income women.
Family Plan World; 1991; ():7, 14. PubMed ID: 12346943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hearing focuses on price of Norplant; Wyeth pledges discount for public sector.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Nov; (18):3-4. PubMed ID: 12318533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinics: Norplant cost chokes services.
Family Plan World; 1993; 3(5):1, 28. PubMed ID: 12319135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Will new Norplant foundation really help low-income women?
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):112. PubMed ID: 12284067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Norplant debate: dollars v. sense. Is Norplant discount in U.S. too little, too late?
Family Plan World; 1994; 4(1):1, 12. PubMed ID: 12318850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A patchwork of funding sources for Norplant users in the U.S.
Antarsh L
AVSC News; 1992 Sep; 30(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wyeth-Ayerst to reduce U.S. price of Norplant implants, but not until December 1995. Family planners outraged.
Contracept Technol Update; 1994 Jan; 15(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12319213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Arrival of Norplant may be bittersweet for clinics.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jan; 12(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12283523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Special report... Norplant -- one year later.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Dec; (20):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12343466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implanted protection. Women slowly turn to Norplant use.
Kobren G
Sun; 1991 Jul; ():1C, 5C. PubMed ID: 12290563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Norplant contraceptive maker accused of profiteering on drug.
Sun; 1993 Nov; ():13A. PubMed ID: 12287220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Free Norplant to troubled teens.
Family Plan World; 1991; ():7. PubMed ID: 12346942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Norplant Foundation increases eligibility with non-physician insertion.
Family Plan World; 1992; ():20. PubMed ID: 12290950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Norplant update.
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1988; 9(2):8. PubMed ID: 12280954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinicians, patients, Medicaid: is anyone to blame for Norplant removal dilemma? Part II.
Contracept Technol Update; 1993 Oct; 14(10):149-53. PubMed ID: 12286902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FDA review panel gives thumbs up to Norplant.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1989 May; ():3-5. PubMed ID: 12290752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Norplant's high cost may prohibit use in Title 10 clinics.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Apr; 12(4):49-52. PubMed ID: 12316798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Norplant contraceptive method gains ground. Approved for distribution in the United States].
Pop Sahel; 1990 Dec; (15):55-6. PubMed ID: 12283990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Another view on Norplant: match method with users.
Herndon N
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):24-6. PubMed ID: 12286081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinics struggle with high Norplant costs.
Family Plan World; 1993; 3(6):23, 29. PubMed ID: 12319106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
