958 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12347484)
1. States continue to expand eligibility for family planning services under Medicaid.
Gold RB
State Reprod Health Monit; 1996 Sep; 7(3):3-5. PubMed ID: 12347484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. States using variety of approaches to expand access to family planning under Medicaid. Special analysis.
Gold RB
State Reprod Health Monit; 1995 Apr; 6(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 12289006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Latest Medicaid waivers break new ground for family planning.
Gold RB
State Reprod Health Monit; 1997 Mar; 8(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 12347839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. State efforts to expand Medicaid-funded family planning show promise.
Gold RB
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1999 Apr; 2(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 12349124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tracking the trends. Year-end review of 1995 state actions on reproductive health policy. Family planning services.
Donovan P
State Reprod Health Monit; 1995 Dec; 6(4):3, 7-8. PubMed ID: 12291287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coverage of abortion controversial in both public and private plans.
Sollom T
State Reprod Health Monit; 1996 Sep; 7(3):5-6. PubMed ID: 12347485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measure aiming to expand family planning introduced in Congress.
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1999 Jun; 2(3):11-2. PubMed ID: 12295188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A patchwork of funding sources for Norplant users in the U.S.
Antarsh L
AVSC News; 1992 Sep; 30(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Family planning funds increased tenfold since FY 1971 while staff remained constant.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Oct; 6(5):62-5. PubMed ID: 12308833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. More family planning and abortion services needed.
Gold R
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 12267090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Economic woes mean cuts to family planning services.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):104, 109-10. PubMed ID: 12284064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Project Redirection: making and measuring a difference.
Quint JC
Adv Adolesc Mental Health; 1990; 4():137-57. PubMed ID: 12317627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Illinois, Massachusetts: governors veto restrictions on state funds for abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Oct; 6(5):57-9. PubMed ID: 12308832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.
Forrest JD; Samara R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How family planning services fare under state bids to restructure Medicaid.
Sollom T
State Reprod Health Monit; 1995 Jun; ():3-7. PubMed ID: 12289943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Poverty in America: trends and new patterns.
O'hare WP
Popul Bull; 1985 Jun; 40(3):1-44. PubMed ID: 12340180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Public funding for U.S. contraceptive services down since 1980 -- $95 million a year goes to sterilization.
Sukop S
AVSC News; 1992 Mar; 30(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 12285114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinicians, patients, Medicaid: is anyone to blame for Norplant removal dilemma? Part II.
Contracept Technol Update; 1993 Oct; 14(10):149-53. PubMed ID: 12286902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Act (Chapter 13), 9 June 1988.
United States. Rhode Island
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():20. PubMed ID: 12289393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An ounce of prevention. Is family planning disappearing from the healthcare picture?
Hirshbein N
ZPG Report; 1992 Apr; 24(2):7. PubMed ID: 12285223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
