136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12348331)
1. Abortion procedures and abortifacients.
Hodgson JE
Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():75-106. PubMed ID: 12348331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current technology for abortion.
Stubblefield PG
Curr Probl Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Dec; 2(4):3-44. PubMed ID: 12310419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive rights: an international sample.
Boyd S
Conscience; 1984; 5(3):13-4. PubMed ID: 12178930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Life after Roe v. Wade.
Bauerlein M
Utne Read; 1992; ():17-20. PubMed ID: 12343822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Some trends in the management of early induced abortion.
Lewis SC
J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1972; 22(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 12333104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Vietnam: excessive practice of abortion].
Donnay F
Entre Nous Cph Den; 1994 May; (25):16. PubMed ID: 12222254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Birth control techniques in China.
Xiao B; Wang M
China Popul Newsl; 1983 Dec; 1(2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12312957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Innovations in traditional Vietnam.
Waldner R
Plan Parent Chall; 1997; (1-2):37-9. PubMed ID: 12293462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The potential impact of improvements in contraception on fertility and abortion in Western countries.
Westoff CF; Hammerslough CR; Paul L
Eur J Popul; 1987 Nov; 3(1):7-32. PubMed ID: 12280731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Access to birth control: a world estimate].
Blanco C
Profamilia; 1988 Apr; 4(12):17-24. PubMed ID: 12281360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of techniques of induced abortion.
Hepburn S
Fam Plann Inf Serv; 1981 Apr; 1(6):16-9. PubMed ID: 12263449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Induced abortion: a world perspective].
Henshaw SK
Perspect Int Planif Fam; 1987; (Spec No):12-6. PubMed ID: 12269047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contraceptives versus abortifacients.
Barber HR
Female Patient; 1990 Nov; 15(11):13-4. PubMed ID: 12343158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ragsdale v. Turnock, 10 March 1988, as amended on 13 April 1988.
United States. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():44-5. PubMed ID: 12289569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postcoital contraception: a delicate political issue.
Contracept Technol Update; 1984 Apr; 5(4):41-3. PubMed ID: 12266621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's responses to abortion: implications for post-abortion support groups.
Lodl KM; Mcgettigan A; Bucy J
J Soc Work Hum Sex; 1985; 3(2-3):119-32. PubMed ID: 12179640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Courts rejecting maternal health rational for hospitalization for all mid-trimester abortions.
Donovan P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):91-4. PubMed ID: 12262415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. South Korea's low fertility raises European-style issues.
Haub C
Popul Today; 1991 Oct; 19(10):3. PubMed ID: 12284303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fertility awareness affects method use.
Barnett B
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1996; 17(1):9. PubMed ID: 12320448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tracking the trends. Year-end review of 1995 state actions on reproductive health policy. Abortion services.
Sollom T
State Reprod Health Monit; 1995 Dec; 6(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 12291286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
