276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12348584)
1. What's behind the antiabortion campaign over "fungibility"?
Cohen SA
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Jun; 1(3):1-2, 7. PubMed ID: 12348584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Grant recipients' rights in question.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exporting abortion politics: the battle over international family planning assistance.
Lasher C
Conscience; 1991; 12(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 12178849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The attempt to break down overseas population assistance: Population Crisis Committee.
Camp SL
Interaction; 1986 Jan; 6(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 12340678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Mexico City Policy: a "gag rule" that violates free speech and democratic values.
Cohen SA
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Apr; 1(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12293660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Family planning at heart of political debate.
Kaeser L
Contracept Technol Update; 1998 Sep; 19(9):121-2. PubMed ID: 12348706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Public Law 100-202, Joint Resolution making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1988, and for other purposes, 22 December 1987.
United States
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():215. PubMed ID: 12289429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New rules on family planning: a good compromise, or a dangerous precedent?
Schlitt C
Monday Dev; 2000 Jan; 18(2):7. PubMed ID: 12349537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion-related issues in the U.S. foreign assistance program.
Mchugh JT
Int Rev; 1988; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 12179687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study cites unmet world demand for contraceptives.. House panel votes to increase Pop Aid funding, rescind program restrictions.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 May; (8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12316871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Funding for international family planning attacked.
Kaeser L
Contracept Technol Update; 1997 Aug; 18(8):101-3. PubMed ID: 12292727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Congressional cuts threaten family planning programs.
Van Hoogstraat A
AVSC News; 1996; 34(2):1, 8. PubMed ID: 12347633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Veto -- or threat thereof -- prevails over majority as 102nd Congress adjourns.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Oct; (15):2-4. PubMed ID: 12317790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statutory Prohibition on Use of Appropriated Funds in Programs Where Abortion is a Method of Family Planning; Standard of Compliance for Family Planning Services Projects, 29 January 1988.
United States. Department of Health and Human Services DHHS
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():13, 299-301. PubMed ID: 12289184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AID to restore support to pop groups shunned under Reagan and Bush.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Aug; (13):3, 4. PubMed ID: 12318257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The international impact of Roe v. Wade.
Brueggemann I
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):19. PubMed ID: 12178878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AID renews ties with IPPF as major foreign aid policy changes are seen. But UNFPA funds being temporarily withheld.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Dec; (19):1-2. PubMed ID: 12345356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Compliance with new ban means no mention of abortion.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):101-2. PubMed ID: 12284062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Title X program faces major upheaval as High Court okays ban on abortion speech.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 May; (9):1-4. PubMed ID: 12343265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. District of Columbia money bill faces last-minute antiabortion challenge.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Oct; (16):1-2. PubMed ID: 12318480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
