376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12348706)
1. Family planning at heart of political debate.
Kaeser L
Contracept Technol Update; 1998 Sep; 19(9):121-2. PubMed ID: 12348706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Mexico City Policy: a "gag rule" that violates free speech and democratic values.
Cohen SA
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Apr; 1(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12293660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Funding for international family planning attacked.
Kaeser L
Contracept Technol Update; 1997 Aug; 18(8):101-3. PubMed ID: 12292727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Grant recipients' rights in question.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The attempt to break down overseas population assistance: Population Crisis Committee.
Camp SL
Interaction; 1986 Jan; 6(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 12340678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exporting abortion politics: the battle over international family planning assistance.
Lasher C
Conscience; 1991; 12(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 12178849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early electioneering highlights party differences on key issues of choice.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (12):1-2. PubMed ID: 12344813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gag rule provision intact as conferees complete work on HHS funding bill. Abortion funding, parental notice dropped.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Oct; (17):1-2. PubMed ID: 12284472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Veto -- or threat thereof -- prevails over majority as 102nd Congress adjourns.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Oct; (15):2-4. PubMed ID: 12317790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. House vote on Hyde changes dynamic of Congressional abortion debate.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jul; (12):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion-related issues in the U.S. foreign assistance program.
Mchugh JT
Int Rev; 1988; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 12179687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. AID to restore support to pop groups shunned under Reagan and Bush.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Aug; (13):3, 4. PubMed ID: 12318257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hillary Clinton takes up defense of U.S. aid for family planning overseas.
Cohen SA
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1996 Dec; (10):2-3. PubMed ID: 12291982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. District of Columbia money bill faces last-minute antiabortion challenge.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Oct; (16):1-2. PubMed ID: 12318480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What's behind the antiabortion campaign over "fungibility"?
Cohen SA
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Jun; 1(3):1-2, 7. PubMed ID: 12348584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New rules on family planning: a good compromise, or a dangerous precedent?
Schlitt C
Monday Dev; 2000 Jan; 18(2):7. PubMed ID: 12349537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statutory Prohibition on Use of Appropriated Funds in Programs Where Abortion is a Method of Family Planning; Standard of Compliance for Family Planning Services Projects, 29 January 1988.
United States. Department of Health and Human Services DHHS
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():13, 299-301. PubMed ID: 12289184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The international impact of Roe v. Wade.
Brueggemann I
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):19. PubMed ID: 12178878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cruel summer: Congressional onslaught on sexual rights.
Daley D
SIECUS Rep; 1995; 24(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 12290591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Domestic, international family planning programs at risk.
Turnbull W; Kaeser L
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Feb; 1(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12321447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
