These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1234931)

  • 21. Damping the hearing aid frequency response: effects on speech clarity and preferred listening level.
    Cox RM; Gilmore C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 3762099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The successful hearing aid user.
    Sanders JW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1978 Feb; 11(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 662345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Check of hearing aid fitting].
    Schorn K
    HNO; 2004 Oct; 52(10):875-85. PubMed ID: 15316629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of three hearing aid evaluation procedures for young children.
    Schwartz DM; Larson VD
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1977 Jul; 103(7):401-406. PubMed ID: 880106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Comparison of audiological performance bewteen bone-anchored and conventional hearing aids].
    Iwasaki S; Hashimoto Y; Nagura M; Takebayashi S; Mizuta K; Mineta H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2005 Nov; 108(11):1110-3. PubMed ID: 16359006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hearing-aid fitting protocol.
    Upfold LJ; Smither MF
    Br J Audiol; 1981 Aug; 15(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 7296096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance characteristics for hearing aid microphone versus telephone and telephone/telecoil reception modes.
    Tannahill JC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 26(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 6887805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Experience with transposer hearing aids.
    Gustafsson A
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (Suppl 8):48-53. PubMed ID: 299120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How Do Hearing Aid Owners Respond to Hearing Aid Problems?
    Bennett RJ; Laplante-Lévesque A; Eikelboom RH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 29782441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life I: The Patients' Perspective.
    Cox RM; Johnson JA; Xu J
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):e224-37. PubMed ID: 26881981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss.
    Sacco G; Gonfrier S; Teboul B; Gahide I; Prate F; Demory-Zory M; Turpin JM; Vuagnoux C; Genovese P; Schneider S; Guérin O; Guevara N
    BMC Geriatr; 2016 Jul; 16():136. PubMed ID: 27392722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Review of hearing aid amplification circuits.
    Barry SJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Apr; 9(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 9564672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and non-linear frequency compression for children with mild to moderate high-frequency hearing loss.
    Wolfe J; John A; Schafer E; Hudson M; Boretzki M; Scollie S; Woods W; Wheeler J; Hudgens K; Neumann S
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):170-81. PubMed ID: 25731582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hearing-aid selection: an integrated approach.
    Stephens SD
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Nov; 18(4):199-210. PubMed ID: 6525472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Speech discrimination and dynamic compression. A comparative study with hearing aids (author's transl)].
    Welleschik B; Wicke W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Jul; 56(7):595-601. PubMed ID: 142877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hearing aid evaluation methods: some underlying assumptions.
    Chial MR; Hayes CS
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1974 Aug; 39(3):270-9. PubMed ID: 4413640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computer-assisted hearing-aid evaluation and fitting program.
    Popelka GR
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1987; 37():166-8. PubMed ID: 3673811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.