825 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12350007)
1. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig reproductive traits.
Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2303-15. PubMed ID: 12350007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig growth and carcass traits.
Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2286-302. PubMed ID: 12350006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Heterosis and recombination effects in Hampshire and Landrace swine: I. Maternal traits.
Baas TJ; Christian LL; Rothschild MF
J Anim Sci; 1992 Jan; 70(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 1582925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of crossbreeding on genetic improvement of growth and reproduction in pigs.
Hale OM; Bondari K
Growth; 1986; 50(4):526-36. PubMed ID: 3596329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lactation feed disappearance and weaning to estrus interval for sows fed spray-dried plasma.
Crenshaw JD; Boyd RD; Campbell JM; Russell LE; Moser RL; Wilson ME
J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3442-53. PubMed ID: 17785594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Milk, fat, protein, somatic cell score, and days open among Holstein, Brown Swiss, and their crosses.
Dechow CD; Rogers GW; Cooper JB; Phelps MI; Mosholder AL
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jul; 90(7):3542-9. PubMed ID: 17582138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlated responses of pre- and postweaning growth and backfat thickness to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
Rosendo A; Canario L; Druet T; Gogué J; Bidanel JP
J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3209-17. PubMed ID: 17609463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic parameters and predicted selection results for maternal traits related to lactation efficiency in sows.
Bergsma R; Kanis E; Verstegen MW; Knol EF
J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1067-80. PubMed ID: 18192550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproduction of 3/4 White Composite and 1/4 Duroc, 1/4 Meishan, 1/4 Fengjing, or 1/4 Minzhu gilts and sows.
Young LD
J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1559-67. PubMed ID: 9655575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
Petry DB; Johnson RK
J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 15080320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive performance of purebred landrace and Yorkshire sows in Thailand with special reference to seasonal influence and parity number.
Tantasuparuk W; Lundeheim N; Dalin AM; Kunavongkrit A; Einarsson S
Theriogenology; 2000 Aug; 54(3):481-96. PubMed ID: 11051330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variance component estimates for alternative litter size traits in swine.
Putz AM; Tiezzi F; Maltecca C; Gray KA; Knauer MT
J Anim Sci; 2015 Nov; 93(11):5153-63. PubMed ID: 26641035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of birth and weaning traits of Romosinuano calves as purebreds and crosses with Brahman and Angus.
Riley DG; Chase CC; Coleman SW; Olson TA
J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 17235015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimates of additive genetic, maternal and specific combining abilities for some litter traits of swine.
Jungst SB; Kuhlers DL
J Anim Sci; 1984 Nov; 59(5):1140-8. PubMed ID: 6542564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of breed and heterosis effects for growth and carcass traits in cattle using published crossbreeding studies.
Williams JL; Aguilar I; Rekaya R; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):460-6. PubMed ID: 19820043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An experimental comparison of equivalent terminal and rotational crossbreeding systems in swine: sow and litter performance.
Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Little JA
J Anim Sci; 1994 Mar; 72(3):584-90. PubMed ID: 8181973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sow productivity comparisons for four breeds of swine: purebred and crossbred litters.
Gaugler HR; Buchanan DS; Hintz RL; Johnson RK
J Anim Sci; 1984 Oct; 59(4):941-7. PubMed ID: 6542563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic merit of crossbred and purebred US dairy cattle.
VanRaden PM; Sanders AH
J Dairy Sci; 2003 Mar; 86(3):1036-44. PubMed ID: 12703641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of six maternal genetic lines for female productivity measures over four parities.
Moeller SJ; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Mabry JW; Baas TJ; Robison OW
J Anim Sci; 2004 Jan; 82(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 14753347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: body condition, skin lesions, and performance.
Salak-Johnson JL; Niekamp SR; Rodriguez-Zas SL; Ellis M; Curtis SE
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1758-69. PubMed ID: 17371790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
