These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12350284)

  • 1. Backward and forward blocking in human electrodermal conditioning: blocking requires an assumption of outcome additivity.
    Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Oct; 55(4):311-29. PubMed ID: 12350284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forward blocking in human learning sometimes reflects the failure to encode a cue-outcome relationship.
    Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF; Minard E; Lavis Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):830-44. PubMed ID: 16608749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.
    Booth SL; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blocking in human electrodermal conditioning.
    Hinchy J; Lovibond PF; Ter-Horst KM
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1995 Feb; 48(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 7740123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning.
    Beckers T; De Houwer J; Pineño O; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 15755242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing excitatory backward and forward conditioning.
    Chang RC; Stout S; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 14690847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recovery from blocking between outcomes.
    Wheeler DS; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 16248732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus exposure effects in human associative learning.
    Myers CE; Oliver LM; Warren SG; Gluck MA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):173-87. PubMed ID: 10881607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blocking and unblocking in human causal learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Oakeshott SM; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jan; 31(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 15656727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome maximality and additivity training also influence cue competition in causal learning when learning involves many cues and events.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 17366305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reaction time as a measure of human associative learning.
    Craddock P; Molet M; Miller RR
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jun; 90(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 22301095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome additivity, elemental processing and blocking in human causality judgements.
    Livesey EJ; Boakes RA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Oct; 57(4):361-79. PubMed ID: 15513261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative effectiveness of concurrent forward/backward versus simple forward and simple backward Pavlovian conditioning procedures.
    Dess NK; Patterson J; Overmier JB
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 3717456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Second-order conditioning in human predictive judgements when there is little time to think.
    Karazinov DM; Boakes RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):448-60. PubMed ID: 17366311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Backward versus forward blocking: evidence for performance-based models of human contingency learning.
    Luque D; Vadillo MA
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Dec; 109(3):1001-16. PubMed ID: 22420128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective revaluation and inhibitory associations: does perceptual learning modulate our perception of the contingencies between events?
    Graham S
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1999 May; 52(2):159-85. PubMed ID: 10371872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Competition between an avoidance response and a safety signal: evidence for a single learning system.
    Lovibond PF; Chen SX; Mitchell CJ; Weidemann G
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Jan; 92(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 21964284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: a challenge for comparator theory.
    Melchers KG; Lachnit H; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):25-53. PubMed ID: 14690848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reasoning rats: forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference.
    Beckers T; Miller RR; De Houwer J; Urushihara K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 16478318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A memory-based account of retrospective revaluation.
    Jamieson RK; Hannah SD; Crump MJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Sep; 64(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 20873913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.