202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12350286)
1. The effects of using stimuli from three different dimensions on autoshaping with a complex negative patterning discrimination.
Pearce JM; George DN
Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Oct; 55(4):349-64. PubMed ID: 12350286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace.
Pearce JM; Redhead ES; George DN
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 11987874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of the unique cue in configural discriminations.
Rescorla RA; Grau JW; Durlach PJ
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Jul; 11(3):356-66. PubMed ID: 4009124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stimulus salience and negative patterning.
Redhead ES; Pearce JM
Q J Exp Psychol B; 1995 Feb; 48(1):67-83. PubMed ID: 7740125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Configural associations in discrimination learning.
Pearce JM; Wilson PN
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jul; 16(3):250-61. PubMed ID: 2398336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Control of matching by differential outcome expectancies in the absence of differential sample-outcome associations: a serial compound view.
Demarse TB; Urcuioli PJ
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):449-66. PubMed ID: 16248731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.
Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA
Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Summation and subtraction using a modified autoshaping procedure in pigeons.
Ploog BO
Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 18396379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Supernormal conditioning.
Pearce JM; Redhead ES
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1995 Apr; 21(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 7738498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of discrimination training on responding during a compound conditioned stimulus.
Pearce JM; Adam J; Wilson PN; Darby RJ
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Oct; 18(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 1402694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodal discrimination learning in humans: evidence for configural theory.
Redhead ES
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1477-95. PubMed ID: 17853209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).
Wills AJ; Lea SE; Leaver LA; Osthaus B; Ryan CM; Suret MB; Bryant CM; Chapman SJ; Millar L
J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 19929108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Matching and oddity relational learning by pigeons (Columba livia): transfer from color to shape.
Lombardi CM
Anim Cogn; 2008 Jan; 11(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 17516101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Local rather than global processing of visual arrays in numerosity discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia).
Emmerton J; Renner JC
Anim Cogn; 2009 May; 12(3):511-26. PubMed ID: 19184137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in the associability of relevant and irrelevant stimuli.
Dopson JC; Esber GR; Pearce JM
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):258-67. PubMed ID: 20384405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrasting object-based and texture-based accounts of same/different discrimination learning with trial-unique stimuli.
Brooks DI; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):158-63. PubMed ID: 20141326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bridging temporal gaps between CS and US in autoshaping: insertion of other stimuli before, during, and after CS.
Kaplan PS; Hearst E
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1982 Apr; 8(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 7069378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning processes in matching and oddity: the oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement.
Wright AA; Delius JD
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 16248729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Representation of serial order in pigeons (Columba livia).
Scarf D; Colombo M
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):423-9. PubMed ID: 20973610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons.
DeLong RE; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Oct; 7(4):394-412. PubMed ID: 7288370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
