BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12352393)

  • 1. Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience.
    Siqueira TM; Kuo RL; Gardner TA; Paterson RF; Stevens LH; Lingeman JE; Koch MO; Shalhav AL
    J Urol; 2002 Oct; 168(4 Pt 1):1361-5. PubMed ID: 12352393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy: the Mayo clinic experience.
    Simon SD; Castle EP; Ferrigni RG; Lamm DL; Swanson SK; Novicki DE; Andrews PE
    J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1447-50. PubMed ID: 15017195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients: outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns.
    Kercher KW; Heniford BT; Matthews BD; Smith TI; Lincourt AE; Hayes DH; Eskind LB; Irby PB; Teigland CM
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Dec; 17(12):1889-95. PubMed ID: 14569452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: ureteral complications in recipients.
    Lind MY; Hazebroek EJ; Kirkels WJ; Hop WC; Weimar W; Ijzermans JN
    Urology; 2004 Jan; 63(1):36-9; discussion 39-40. PubMed ID: 14751343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience.
    Jacobs SC; Cho E; Foster C; Liao P; Bartlett ST
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 14665841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: a single-center experience.
    Kim BS; Yoo ES; Kwon TG
    Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1283-7. PubMed ID: 19362334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complications of laparoscopic renal surgery.
    Waxman SW; Winfield HN
    J Endourol; 2010 Mar; 24(3):381-3. PubMed ID: 20078236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of 2,590 urological laparoscopic surgeries undertaken by urological surgeons accredited by an endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in urological laparoscopy in Japan.
    Habuchi T; Terachi T; Mimata H; Kondo Y; Kanayama H; Ichikawa T; Nutahara K; Miki T; Ono Y; Baba S; Naito S; Matsuda T
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Jun; 26(6):1656-63. PubMed ID: 22179473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complications of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and their management: the UCLA experience.
    Breda A; Veale J; Liao J; Schulam PG
    Urology; 2007 Jan; 69(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 17270612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conversion during laparoscopic surgery: frequency, indications and risk factors.
    Richstone L; Seideman C; Baldinger L; Permpongkosol S; Jarrett TW; Su LM; Pavlovich C; Kavoussi LR
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):855-9. PubMed ID: 18635228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complications of abdominal urologic laparoscopy: longitudinal five-year analysis.
    Parsons JK; Varkarakis I; Rha KH; Jarrett TW; Pinto PA; Kavoussi LR
    Urology; 2004 Jan; 63(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 14751341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complications after a 5-year experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the Indiana University experience.
    Sundaram CP; Martin GL; Guise A; Bernie J; Bargman V; Milgrom M; Shalhav A; Govani M; Goggins W
    Surg Endosc; 2007 May; 21(5):724-8. PubMed ID: 17334861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: surgical technique and results].
    Léfi M; Gamé X; Cointault O; Mouzin M; Kamar N; Vaessen C; Malavaud B; Sarramon JP; Durand D; Rischmann P
    Prog Urol; 2006 Jun; 16(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 16821347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic nephrectomy outcomes of elderly patients in the 21st century.
    Lai FC; Kau EL; Ng CS; Fuchs GJ
    J Endourol; 2007 Nov; 21(11):1309-13. PubMed ID: 18042020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience.
    Jacobs SC; Cho E; Dunkin BJ; Flowers JL; Schweitzer E; Cangro C; Fink J; Farney A; Philosophe B; Jarrell B; Bartlett ST
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1494-9. PubMed ID: 11025690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy without intraoperative systemic heparinization.
    Cheng EY; Leeser DB; Kapur S; Del Pizzo J
    J Urol; 2010 Jun; 183(6):2282-6. PubMed ID: 20400133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy 1997 to 2003: lessons learned with 500 cases at a single institution.
    Leventhal JR; Kocak B; Salvalaggio PR; Koffron AJ; Baker TB; Kaufman DB; Fryer JP; Abecassis MM; Stuart FP
    Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):881-90. PubMed ID: 15467675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 200 consecutive hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies: evolution of operative technique and outcomes.
    Fisher PC; Montgomery JS; Johnston WK; Wolf JS
    J Urol; 2006 Apr; 175(4):1439-43. PubMed ID: 16516016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ureteral complications in the era of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: do we need to preserve the gonadal vein with the specimen?
    Kocak B; Baker TB; Koffron AJ; Leventhal JR
    J Endourol; 2010 Feb; 24(2):247-51. PubMed ID: 20059394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome of renal transplantation with multiple versus single renal arteries after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparative study.
    Desai MR; Ganpule AP; Gupta R; Thimmegowda M
    Urology; 2007 May; 69(5):824-7. PubMed ID: 17482914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.