155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12354087)
1. Learning root debridement with curettes and power-driven instruments. Part I: a training program to increase effectivity.
Rühling A; Schlemme H; König J; Kocher T; Schwahn C; Plagmann HC
J Clin Periodontol; 2002 Jul; 29(7):622-9. PubMed ID: 12354087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning root debridement with curettes and power-driven instruments. Part II: Clinical results following mechanical, nonsurgical therapy.
Rühling A; König J; Rolf H; Kocher T; Schwahn C; Plagmann HC
J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Jul; 30(7):611-5. PubMed ID: 12834498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning root debridement with curettes and power-driven instruments in vitro: the role of operator motivation and self-assessment.
König J; Rühling A; Schlemme H; Kocher T; Schwahn C; Plagmann HC
Eur J Dent Educ; 2002 Nov; 6(4):169-75. PubMed ID: 12410668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a systematic digitized training program on the effectivity of subgingival instrumentation with curettes and sonic scalers in vitro.
Graetz C; Fecke P; Seidel M; Engel AS; Schorr S; Sentker J; Dörfer CE; Sälzer S
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jan; 25(1):219-230. PubMed ID: 32474807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of four methods of assessing root surface debridement.
Chan YK; Needleman IG; Clifford LR
J Periodontol; 2000 Mar; 71(3):385-93. PubMed ID: 10776925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
Drisko CH
Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative clinical responses related to the use of various periodontal instrumentation.
Obeid PR; D'Hoore W; Bercy P
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 15016023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits.
Kocher T; Langenbeck M; Rühling A; Plagmann HC
J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10783837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study.
Silva D; Martins O; Matos S; Lopes P; Rolo T; Baptista I
Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The clinical effectiveness of open versus closed scaling and root planing on multi-rooted teeth.
Wylam JM; Mealey BL; Mills MP; Waldrop TC; Moskowicz DC
J Periodontol; 1993 Nov; 64(11):1023-8. PubMed ID: 8295086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical effects of root instrumentation using conventional steel or non-tooth substance removing plastic curettes during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT).
Bardet P; Suvan J; Lang NP
J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Nov; 26(11):742-7. PubMed ID: 10589810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of handedness on learning subgingival scaling with curettes: a study on manikins.
Canakci V; Ciçek Y; Canakci CF; Demir T; Kavrut F; Kara C; Ozgöz M; Dilsiz A; Canakci E
Int J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 114(11):1463-82. PubMed ID: 15636356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of subgingival instrumentation with power-driven instruments in the hands of experienced and inexperienced operators. A study on manikins.
Kocher T; Rühling A; Momsen H; Plagmann HC
J Clin Periodontol; 1997 Jul; 24(7):498-504. PubMed ID: 9226391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scaling and root planing without overinstrumentation: hand versus power-driven scalers.
Drisko CL
Curr Opin Periodontol; 1993; ():78-88. PubMed ID: 8401851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effectiveness of scaling and root planing with curets designed for deep pockets.
Nagy RJ; Otomo-Corgel J; Stambaugh R
J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12):954-9. PubMed ID: 1474467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diamond burs versus curettes in root planing: a randomized clinical trial.
Türktekin F; Buduneli N; Lappin DF; Türk T; Buduneli E
Aust Dent J; 2018 Jun; 63(2):242-252. PubMed ID: 29432640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Removal of simulated biofilm: an evaluation of the effect on root surfaces roughness after scaling.
Graetz C; Plaumann A; Wittich R; Springer C; Kahl M; Dörfer CE; El-Sayed KF
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 27233902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subgingival instrumentation to remove simulated plaque in vitro: influence of operators' experience and type of instrument.
Graetz C; Schwendicke F; Plaumann A; Rauschenbach S; Springer C; Kahl M; Sälzer S; Dörfer CE
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jun; 19(5):987-95. PubMed ID: 25231069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Root debridement of single-rooted teeth with a diamond-coated sonic scaler insert during flap surgery. A pilot study.
Kocher T; Plagmann HC
J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Apr; 26(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 10223389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative in vitro effectiveness of closed root debridement with fine instruments on specific areas of mandibular first molar furcations. I. Root trunk and furcation entrance.
Otero-Cagide FJ; Long BA
J Periodontol; 1997 Nov; 68(11):1093-7. PubMed ID: 9407402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
