These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12354145)

  • 1. Sib-parentage testing using molecular markers when parents are unknown.
    García D; Carleos C; Parra D; Cañón J
    Anim Genet; 2002 Oct; 33(5):364-71. PubMed ID: 12354145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Algorithms of likelihood ratio for discriminating full sibling from half sibling].
    Zhao SM; Zhang LN; Zhang SH; Zhang N; Zhao ZM; Li CT
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 28(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 22619804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parentage and sibship exclusions: higher statistical power with more family members.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Aug; 99(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 17487215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of using co-dominant polymorphic allelic series for (1) checking pedigrees and (2) distinguishing full-sib pair members.
    Jamieson A
    Anim Genet; 1994 Jun; 25 Suppl 1():37-44. PubMed ID: 7943982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference.
    Anderson EC; Garza JC
    Genetics; 2006 Apr; 172(4):2567-82. PubMed ID: 16387880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing for linkage disequilibrium in the New Zealand radiata pine breeding population.
    Kumar S; Echt C; Wilcox PL; Richardson TE
    Theor Appl Genet; 2004 Jan; 108(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 12898020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inferring unknown genotypes of sires at codominant deoxyribonucleic acid markers in half-sib families.
    Gomez-Raya L
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):1872-82. PubMed ID: 19251934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The use of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of gametic frequencies of multilocus polymorphic codominant systems based on sampled population data].
    Sergeev AS; Arapova RK
    Genetika; 2002 Mar; 38(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 11963570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic evaluation using parentage information from genetic markers.
    Dodds KG; Tate ML; Sise JA
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Oct; 83(10):2271-9. PubMed ID: 16160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.
    Wang J; Santure AW
    Genetics; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1579-94. PubMed ID: 19221199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion.
    Jamieson A; Taylor SC
    Anim Genet; 1997 Dec; 28(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 9616104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An improved multipoint sib-pair analysis of quantitative traits.
    Fulker DW; Cherny SS
    Behav Genet; 1996 Sep; 26(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 8917952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power of microsatellite markers for analysis of genetic variation and parentage verification in sheep.
    Qanbari S; Nasab MP; Osfoori R; Nazari AH
    Pak J Biol Sci; 2007 May; 10(10):1632-8. PubMed ID: 19086509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using genomic relationship likelihood for parentage assignment.
    Grashei KE; Ødegård J; Meuwissen THE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 May; 50(1):26. PubMed ID: 29776335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. p-loci: a computer program for choosing the most efficient set of loci for parentage assignment.
    Matson SE; Camara MD; Eichert W; Banks MA
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2008 Jul; 8(4):765-8. PubMed ID: 21585886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of migration rates from marker-based parentage analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Jul; 23(13):3191-213. PubMed ID: 24863365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imputation of ungenotyped parental genotypes in dairy and beef cattle from progeny genotypes.
    Berry DP; McParland S; Kearney JF; Sargolzaei M; Mullen MP
    Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 24840560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
    Knapp M; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of microsatellite markers for parentage testing of two litters of beagles born after artifcial insemination with mixed fresh semen.
    Takagi K; Tsumagari S; Ichikawa Y; Ishihama K; Morita M; Kanemaki M; Takeishi M
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2001; 47 Online Pub():OL181-5. PubMed ID: 11936866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.