These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12354145)

  • 21. Performing Parentage Analysis in the Presence of Inbreeding and Null Alleles.
    Huang K; Mi R; Dunn DW; Wang T; Li B
    Genetics; 2018 Dec; 210(4):1467-1481. PubMed ID: 30337340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microsatellite polymorphism in closely related dogs.
    Altet L; Francino O; Sánchez A
    J Hered; 2001; 92(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 11447246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relative accuracy of three common methods of parentage analysis in natural populations.
    Harrison HB; Saenz-Agudelo P; Planes S; Jones GP; Berumen ML
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Feb; 22(4):1158-70. PubMed ID: 23278953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Power of microsatellite markers for fingerprinting and parentage analysis in Eucalyptus grandis breeding populations.
    Kirst M; Cordeiro CM; Rezende GD; Grattapaglia D
    J Hered; 2005; 96(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 15601907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
    Thomson G; Motro U
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How many markers are enough? Factors influencing parentage testing in different livestock populations.
    Strucken EM; Lee SH; Lee HK; Song KD; Gibson JP; Gondro C
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Feb; 133(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 26234440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Difficulties in parentage analysis: the probability that an offspring and parent have the same heterozygous genotype.
    Fiumera AC; Asmussen MA
    Genet Res; 2001 Oct; 78(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 11732093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of genomic selection for growth and wood quality traits in two control-pollinated progeny trials using exome capture as the genotyping platform in Norway spruce.
    Chen ZQ; Baison J; Pan J; Karlsson B; Andersson B; Westin J; García-Gil MR; Wu HX
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Dec; 19(1):946. PubMed ID: 30563448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness.
    Blouin MS; Parsons M; Lacaille V; Lotz S
    Mol Ecol; 1996 Jun; 5(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 8688959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On marker-based parentage verification via non-linear optimization.
    Boerner V
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):50. PubMed ID: 28619083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing parent numbers from offspring genotypes: the importance of marker polymorphism.
    Sefc KM; Koblmüller S
    J Hered; 2009; 100(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 18984859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A more powerful robust sib-pair test of linkage for quantitative traits.
    Amos CI; Elston RC; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(3):435-49. PubMed ID: 2753353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Characterization of the WILMS-TF microsatellite marker in Hungarian dog populations.
    Zenke P; Maróti-Agóts A; Pádár Z; Zöldág L
    Acta Biol Hung; 2009 Sep; 60(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 19700392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accurate partition of individuals into full-sib families from genetic data without parental information.
    Smith BR; Herbinger CM; Merry HR
    Genetics; 2001 Jul; 158(3):1329-38. PubMed ID: 11454779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Parentage identification using single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes: application to product tracing.
    Hill WG; Salisbury BA; Webb AJ
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Oct; 86(10):2508-17. PubMed ID: 18502887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An evaluation of the International Society for Animal Genetics recommended parentage and identification panel for the domestic pigeon (Columba livia domestica).
    de Groot M; van Haeringen WA
    Anim Genet; 2017 Aug; 48(4):431-435. PubMed ID: 28449233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of genotype x environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs.
    Mulder HA; Bijma P
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 15583042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing two commercial domestic dog (Canis familiaris) STR genotyping kits for forensic identity calculations in a mixed-breed dog population sample.
    Kanthaswamy S; Oldt RF; Montes M; Falak A
    Anim Genet; 2019 Feb; 50(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 30592310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An accurate formula to calculate exclusion power of marker sets in parentage assignment.
    Vandeputte M
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Dec; 44(1):36. PubMed ID: 23206351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficient computation of genotype probabilities for loci with many alleles: I. Allelic peeling.
    Thallman RM; Bennett GL; Keele JW; Kappes SM
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 11204709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.