BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12354329)

  • 21. Simultaneous Critical Values For T-Tests In Very High Dimensions.
    Cao H; Kosorok MR
    Bernoulli (Andover); 2011 Feb; 17(1):347-394. PubMed ID: 21572564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identification of differentially expressed genes and false discovery rate in microarray studies.
    Gusnanto A; Calza S; Pawitan Y
    Curr Opin Lipidol; 2007 Apr; 18(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 17353668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long versus short oligonucleotide microarrays for the study of gene expression in nonhuman primates.
    Walker SJ; Wang Y; Grant KA; Chan F; Hellmann GM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Apr; 152(1-2):179-89. PubMed ID: 16253343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates.
    Dudoit S; van der Laan MJ; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article13. PubMed ID: 16646791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A general method for accurate estimation of false discovery rates in identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Tan YD; Xu H
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jul; 30(14):2018-25. PubMed ID: 24632499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing differential expression in two-color microarrays: a resampling-based empirical Bayes approach.
    Li D; Le Pape MA; Parikh NI; Chen WX; Dye TD
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80099. PubMed ID: 24312198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rank products: a simple, yet powerful, new method to detect differentially regulated genes in replicated microarray experiments.
    Breitling R; Armengaud P; Amtmann A; Herzyk P
    FEBS Lett; 2004 Aug; 573(1-3):83-92. PubMed ID: 15327980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Methods for evaluating clustering algorithms for gene expression data using a reference set of functional classes.
    Datta S; Datta S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 7():397. PubMed ID: 16945146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An investigation of two multivariate permutation methods for controlling the false discovery proportion.
    Korn EL; Li MC; McShane LM; Simon R
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(24):4428-40. PubMed ID: 17357994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of false discovery rate methods in identifying genes with differential expression.
    Qian HR; Huang S
    Genomics; 2005 Oct; 86(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 16054333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
    Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Significance analysis of ROC indices for comparing diagnostic markers: applications to gene microarray data.
    Tsai CA; Chen JJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Nov; 14(4):985-1003. PubMed ID: 15587976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ranking analysis of microarray data: a powerful method for identifying differentially expressed genes.
    Tan YD; Fornage M; Fu YX
    Genomics; 2006 Dec; 88(6):846-854. PubMed ID: 16979869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Classes of Multiple Decision Functions Strongly Controlling FWER and FDR.
    Peña EA; Habiger JD; Wu W
    Metrika; 2015 Jul; 78(5):563-595. PubMed ID: 26166847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A microarray gene expression study of the molecular pharmacology of lithium carbonate on mouse brain mRNA to understand the neurobiology of mood stabilization and treatment of bipolar affective disorder.
    McQuillin A; Rizig M; Gurling HM
    Pharmacogenet Genomics; 2007 Aug; 17(8):605-17. PubMed ID: 17622937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robust gene selection methods using weighting schemes for microarray data analysis.
    Kang S; Song J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 18(1):389. PubMed ID: 28865426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Identification of Genes Discriminating Multiple Sclerosis Patients from Controls by Adapting a Pathway Analysis Method.
    Zhang L; Wang L; Tian P; Tian S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165543. PubMed ID: 27846233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A two-step hierarchical hypothesis set testing framework, with applications to gene expression data on ordered categories.
    Li Y; Ghosh D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 15():108. PubMed ID: 24731138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of oligonucleotide array experiments with repeated measures using mixed models.
    Li H; Wood CL; Getchell TV; Getchell ML; Stromberg AJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 5():209. PubMed ID: 15626348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.