These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12354982)

  • 1. Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels.
    Swan JS; Carroll TJ; Kennell TW; Heisey DM; Korosec FR; Frayne R; Mistretta CA; Grist TM
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 12354982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries with the blood pool agent Vasovist: initial results in comparison to intra-arterial DSA].
    Vogt FM; Herborn CU; Parsons EC; Kröger K; Barkhausen J; Goyen M
    Rofo; 2007 Apr; 179(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 17385136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
    Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Routine use of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
    Deutschmann HA; Schoellnast H; Portugaller HR; Preidler KW; Reittner P; Tillich M; Pilger E; Szolar DH
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(5):762-70. PubMed ID: 16625410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of gadofosveset-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography for lower-extremity peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Grijalba FU; Esandi MC
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 20105092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: evaluation of a high spatial and temporal resolution 3-T MR protocol with a low total dose of gadolinium versus conventional angiography.
    Attenberger UI; Haneder S; Morelli JN; Diehl SJ; Schoenberg SO; Michaely HJ
    Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):879-87. PubMed ID: 20959539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts.
    Froger CL; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Douwes-Draaijer P; Cuypers PW; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):284-91. PubMed ID: 15618386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pedal angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: first-pass i.v. contrast-enhanced MR angiography with blood pool contrast medium versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Kos S; Reisinger C; Aschwanden M; Bongartz GM; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Mar; 192(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 19234277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography.
    Andreisek G; Pfammatter T; Goepfert K; Nanz D; Hervo P; Koppensteiner R; Weishaupt D
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):610-20. PubMed ID: 17179394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience.
    Meaney JF; Ridgway JP; Chakraverty S; Robertson I; Kessel D; Radjenovic A; Kouwenhoven M; Kassner A; Smith MA
    Radiology; 1999 Apr; 211(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 10189454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intra-arterial MR-angiography on an open-bore MR-scanner compared to digital-subtraction angiography of the infra-popliteal runoff in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Huegli RW; Thalhammer C; Jacob AL; Jaeger K; Bilecen D
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jun; 66(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17658713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Bongartz G; Jaeger K; Heidecker HG; Thalhammer C; Schulte AC; Hashagen C; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):901-8. PubMed ID: 16641335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    van den Bosch HC; Westenberg JJ; Caris R; Duijm LE; Tielbeek AV; Cuypers PW; de Roos A
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):337-46. PubMed ID: 23143021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-station bolus-chase MR angiography with a stationary table: a simple alternative to automated-table techniques.
    Pandharipande PV; Lee VS; Reuss PM; Charles HW; Rosen RJ; Krinsky GA; Weinreb JC; Rofsky NM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1583-9. PubMed ID: 12438059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Renal artery stenosis evaluation: diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography--comparison with DSA.
    Soulez G; Pasowicz M; Benea G; Grazioli L; Niedmann JP; Konopka M; Douek PC; Morana G; Schaefer FK; Vanzulli A; Bluemke DA; Maki JH; Prince MR; Schneider G; Ballarati C; Coulden R; Wasser MN; McCauley TR; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):273-85. PubMed ID: 18372471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T--highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view.
    Nael K; Villablanca JP; Pope WB; McNamara TO; Laub G; Finn JP
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 17255428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Ruehm SG; Hany TF; Pfammatter T; Schneider E; Ladd M; Debatin JF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Apr; 174(4):1127-35. PubMed ID: 10749264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripheral arterial disease: comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis.
    Leiner T; Kessels AG; Nelemans PJ; Vasbinder GB; de Haan MW; Kitslaar PE; Ho KY; Tordoir JH; van Engelshoven JM
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):699-708. PubMed ID: 15858107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Neufang A; Düber C; Krummenauer F; Küstner E; Laub G; Thelen M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):171-9. PubMed ID: 10628475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.