990 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12354996)
1. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates.
Bendeck SE; Nino-Murcia M; Berry GJ; Jeffrey RB
Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 12354996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children.
Applegate KE; Sivit CJ; Salvator AE; Borisa VJ; Dudgeon DL; Stallion AE; Grisoni ER
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 11425980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates.
Balthazar EJ; Rofsky NM; Zucker R
Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 May; 93(5):768-71. PubMed ID: 9625125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of preoperative computed tomography on patients undergoing appendectomy.
McDonald GP; Pendarvis DP; Wilmoth R; Daley BJ
Am Surg; 2001 Nov; 67(11):1017-21. PubMed ID: 11730216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acute appendicitis in children: comparison of clinical diagnosis with ultrasound and CT imaging.
Karakas SP; Guelfguat M; Leonidas JC; Springer S; Singh SP
Pediatr Radiol; 2000 Feb; 30(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 10663520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children does not influence the overall rate of negative appendectomy or perforation.
Weyant MJ; Eachempati SR; Maluccio MA; Spigland N; Hydo LJ; Barie PS
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2001; 2(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12594877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can computed tomography scan be performed effectively in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis without the added morbidity of rectal contrast?
Dearing DD; Recabaren JA; Alexander M
Am Surg; 2008 Oct; 74(10):917-20. PubMed ID: 18942613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients.
Rhea JT; Halpern EF; Ptak T; Lawrason JN; Sacknoff R; Novelline RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1802-8. PubMed ID: 15908534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a pediatric population: to CT or not to CT.
Stephen AE; Segev DL; Ryan DP; Mullins ME; Kim SH; Schnitzer JJ; Doody DP
J Pediatr Surg; 2003 Mar; 38(3):367-71; discsussion 367-71. PubMed ID: 12632351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Fewer unnecessary appendectomies following ultrasonography and CT].
Leeuwenburgh MM; Bakker OJ; Gorzeman MP; Bollen TL; Seldenrijk CA; Go PM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A869. PubMed ID: 20456809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study.
Coursey CA; Nelson RC; Patel MB; Cochran C; Dodd LG; Delong DM; Beam CA; Vaslef S
Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):460-8. PubMed ID: 20093517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracies of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis.
Park JS; Jeong JH; Lee JI; Lee JH; Park JK; Moon HJ
Am Surg; 2013 Jan; 79(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 23317620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates.
Rao PM; Rhea JT; Rattner DW; Venus LG; Novelline RA
Ann Surg; 1999 Mar; 229(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 10077046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. US as a primary diagnostic tool in relation to negative appendectomy: six years experience.
Puig S; Hörmann M; Rebhandl W; Felder-Puig R; Prokop M; Paya K
Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 12511675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy.
van Breda Vriesman AC; Kole BJ; Puylaert JB
Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2278-82. PubMed ID: 12845461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suspected appendicitis in children: US and CT--a prospective randomized study.
Kaiser S; Frenckner B; Jorulf HK
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):633-8. PubMed ID: 12034928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The negative appendectomy rate: who benefits from preoperative CT?
Webb EM; Nguyen A; Wang ZJ; Stengel JW; Westphalen AC; Coakley FV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):861-6. PubMed ID: 21940573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.
Lee SL; Walsh AJ; Ho HS
Arch Surg; 2001 May; 136(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 11343547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective.
Raja AS; Wright C; Sodickson AD; Zane RD; Schiff GD; Hanson R; Baeyens PF; Khorasani R
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):460-5. PubMed ID: 20529988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Limits and advantages of abdominal ultrasonography in children with acute appendicitis syndrome.
Pastore V; Cocomazzi R; Basile A; Pastore M; Bartoli F
Afr J Paediatr Surg; 2014; 11(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 25323176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
