These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1047 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12355001)

  • 1. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
    Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening ultrasonography revealed 15% of mammographically occult breast cancers.
    Uchida K; Yamashita A; Kawase K; Kamiya K
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 18224382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The use of echography and US-guided percutaneous puncture in addition to mammography for the detection of malignant breast tumors].
    Matricardi L; Lovati R; Nazzaro V; Guarneri A; Calzoni G; Gagliano E; Donato F
    Radiol Med; 1992 Apr; 83(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 1318561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Small (< 2.0-cm) breast cancers: mammographic and US findings at US-guided cryoablation--initial experience.
    Roubidoux MA; Sabel MS; Bailey JE; Kleer CG; Klein KA; Helvie MA
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):857-67. PubMed ID: 15567802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results.
    Kuhl CK; Schmutzler RK; Leutner CC; Kempe A; Wardelmann E; Hocke A; Maringa M; Pfeifer U; Krebs D; Schild HH
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):267-79. PubMed ID: 10751498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Importance of physical examination in the absence of a mammographic abnormality for the detection of early-stage breast cancer.
    Diratzouian H; Freedman GM; Hanlon AL; Eisenberg DF; Anderson PR
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2005 Oct; 6(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 16277883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast MR imaging screening in women with a history of breast conservation therapy.
    Gweon HM; Cho N; Han W; Yi A; Moon HG; Noh DY; Moon WK
    Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 24635678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics.
    Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
    Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):191-9. PubMed ID: 9530316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of screening whole-breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts.
    Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Kim H
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 23980217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Accuracy and direct medical cost of different screening modalities for breast cancer among Chinese women].
    Kang M; Zhao Y; Huang Y; Li J; Liu L; Li H
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 36(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 24785288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival.
    Porter GJ; Evans AJ; Cornford EJ; Burrell HC; James JJ; Lee AH; Chakrabarti J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):676-83. PubMed ID: 17312053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer.
    Steinberg JL; Trudeau ME; Ryder DE; Fishell E; Chapman JA; McCready DR; Fish EB; Hiraki GY; Ross TM; Lickley LA
    Can J Surg; 1996 Aug; 39(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 8697321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors.
    Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Wray LA; Helvie MA
    Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 14695385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
    Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study.
    Brem RF; Tabár L; Duffy SW; Inciardi MF; Guingrich JA; Hashimoto BE; Lander MR; Lapidus RL; Peterson MK; Rapelyea JA; Roux S; Schilling KJ; Shah BA; Torrente J; Wynn RT; Miller DP
    Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 25329763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design.
    Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; Peeters PH; Loo CE; Mann RM; de Jong MD; Bisschops RH; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MB; Pijnappel RM; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van den Bosch MA; Monninkhof EM; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH
    Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 26110667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New approaches to the imaging, diagnosis, and biopsy of breast lesions.
    Esserman LJ
    Cancer J; 2002; 8 Suppl 1():S1-14. PubMed ID: 12075695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program.
    Oestreicher N; Lehman CD; Seger DJ; Buist DS; White E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):428-32. PubMed ID: 15671358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review.
    Moy L; Slanetz PJ; Moore R; Satija S; Yeh ED; McCarthy KA; Hall D; Staffa M; Rafferty EA; Halpern E; Kopans DB
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 12355002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.