These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Biomechanical evaluation of meniscal repair systems: a comparison of the Meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical mattress FasT-Fix Device, and vertical mattress ethibond sutures. Chang HC; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Burden R Am J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1846-52. PubMed ID: 16157854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A biomechanical study of four different meniscal repair systems, comparing pull-out strengths and gapping under cyclic loading. McDermott ID; Richards SW; Hallam P; Tavares S; Lavelle JR; Amis AA Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2003 Jan; 11(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12548447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system and the RapidLoc device in cadaver meniscus. Kocabey Y; Chang HC; Brand JC; Nawab A; Nyland J; Caborn DN Arthroscopy; 2006 Apr; 22(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16581453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Failure strengths of suture versus biodegradable arrow for meniscal repair: an in vitro study. Dervin GF; Downing KJ; Keene GC; McBride DG Arthroscopy; 1997 Jun; 13(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 9195024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical test comparing the load to failure of the biodegradable meniscus arrow versus meniscal suture. Song EK; Lee KB Arthroscopy; 1999 Oct; 15(7):726-32. PubMed ID: 10524820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical investigations of different meniscal repair implants in comparison with horizontal sutures on human meniscus. Becker R; Schröder M; Stärke C; Urbach D; Nebelung W Arthroscopy; 2001 May; 17(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 11337709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A biomechanical comparison of the Mitek RapidLoc, Mitek Meniscal repair system, clearfix screws and vertical PDS and Ti-Cron sutures. Naqui SZ; Thiryayi WA; Hopgood P; Ryan WG Knee; 2006 Mar; 13(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 16338137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pull-out strength and stiffness of meniscal repair using absorbable arrows or Ti-Cron vertical and horizontal loop sutures. Boenisch UW; Faber KJ; Ciarelli M; Steadman JR; Arnoczky SP Am J Sports Med; 1999; 27(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 10496581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cyclic joint loading can affect the initial stability of meniscal fixation implants. Dürselen L; Schneider J; Galler M; Claes LE; Bauer G Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Jan; 18(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 12527246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repair of peripheral vertical meniscus lesions in porcine menisci: in vitro biomechanical testing of 3 different meniscus repair devices. Lee YH; Nyland J; Burden R; Caborn DN Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1074-81. PubMed ID: 23475943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Failure strengths of suture vs. biodegradable arrow and staple for meniscal repair: an in vitro study. Walsh SP; Evans SL; O'Doherty DM; Barlow IW Knee; 2001 Jun; 8(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 11337243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fixation strength of meniscal repair devices. Bellemans J; Vandenneucker H; Labey L; Van Audekercke R Knee; 2002 Feb; 9(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 11830375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A biomechanical evaluation of all-inside 2-stitch meniscal repair devices with matched inside-out suture repair. Ramappa AJ; Chen A; Hertz B; Wexler M; Grimaldi Bournissaint L; DeAngelis JP; Nazarian A Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jan; 42(1):194-9. PubMed ID: 24114752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]