BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12356955)

  • 1. The ethical problem of false positives: a prospective evaluation of physician reporting in the medical record.
    Dresselhaus TR; Luck J; Peabody JW
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Oct; 28(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 12356955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality.
    Peabody JW; Luck J; Glassman P; Dresselhaus TR; Lee M
    JAMA; 2000 Apr; 283(13):1715-22. PubMed ID: 10755498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record.
    Luck J; Peabody JW; Dresselhaus TR; Lee M; Glassman P
    Am J Med; 2000 Jun; 108(8):642-9. PubMed ID: 10856412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How well does record abstraction quantify the content of optometric eye examinations in the UK?
    Shah R; Edgar DF; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jul; 29(4):383-96. PubMed ID: 19523086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of standardised patients, record abstraction and clinical vignettes for the purpose of measuring clinical practice.
    Shah R; Edgar DF; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 May; 30(3):209-24. PubMed ID: 20444128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring compliance with preventive care guidelines: standardized patients, clinical vignettes, and the medical record.
    Dresselhaus TR; Peabody JW; Lee M; Wang MM; Luck J
    J Gen Intern Med; 2000 Nov; 15(11):782-8. PubMed ID: 11119170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of vignettes for predicting variation in the quality of preventive care.
    Dresselhaus TR; Peabody JW; Luck J; Bertenthal D
    J Gen Intern Med; 2004 Oct; 19(10):1013-8. PubMed ID: 15482553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study.
    Peabody JW; Luck J; Glassman P; Jain S; Hansen J; Spell M; Lee M
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 Nov; 141(10):771-80. PubMed ID: 15545677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the accuracy of administrative data in health information systems.
    Peabody JW; Luck J; Jain S; Bertenthal D; Glassman P
    Med Care; 2004 Nov; 42(11):1066-72. PubMed ID: 15586833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using standardised patients to measure physicians' practice: validation study using audio recordings.
    Luck J; Peabody JW
    BMJ; 2002 Sep; 325(7366):679. PubMed ID: 12351358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controlled trial of a patient-completed history questionnaire: effects on quality of documentation and patient and physician satisfaction.
    Hershey CO; Grant BJ
    Am J Med Qual; 2002; 17(4):126-35. PubMed ID: 12153065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How accurate is the medical record? A comparison of the physician's note with a concealed audio recording in unannounced standardized patient encounters.
    Weiner SJ; Wang S; Kelly B; Sharma G; Schwartz A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 May; 27(5):770-775. PubMed ID: 32330258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to limit the burden of data collection for Quality Indicators based on medical records? The COMPAQH experience.
    Corriol C; Daucourt V; Grenier C; Minvielle E
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Oct; 8():215. PubMed ID: 18940005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coders join forces with physicians to improve clinical outcomes.
    Noller JR
    J AHIMA; 2000 Jan; 71(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 11009649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A standardized quality assessment system to evaluate pain detection and management in the nursing home.
    Cadogan MP; Schnelle JF; Al-Sammarrai NR; Yamamoto-Mitani N; Cabrera G; Osterweil D; Simmons SF
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2005; 6(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15871864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardized Reporting in IR: A Prospective Multi-Institutional Pilot Study.
    McWilliams JP; Shah RP; Quirk M; White SB; Dybul SL; Ahrar J; Steele JR; Kwan SW; Handel J; Winokur RS; Gilliland CA; Durack JC
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1779-1785. PubMed ID: 27670943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disparity in coding concordance: do physicians and coders agree?
    Lorence DP; Ibrahim IA
    J Health Care Finance; 2003; 29(4):43-53. PubMed ID: 12908653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attending Physician Adherence to a 29-Component Central Venous Catheter Bundle Checklist During Simulated Procedures.
    Barsuk JH; Cohen ER; Nguyen D; Mitra D; O'Hara K; Okuda Y; Feinglass J; Cameron KA; McGaghie WC; Wayne DB
    Crit Care Med; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1871-81. PubMed ID: 27336437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Medical records audit in primary care clinics of the Israel Navy].
    Vinker S; Mankuta D; Yischak B; Ber Y; Nachtigal D; Biran Y
    Harefuah; 1996 Dec; 131(11):477-9, 535. PubMed ID: 9043157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.