BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12358106)

  • 21. Influence of the quality of the finished occlusion on postretention occlusal relapse.
    de Freitas KM; Janson G; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Henriques JF; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):428.e9-14. PubMed ID: 17920494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An assessment of orthodontic treatment using occlusal indices.
    Chew MT; Sandham A
    Singapore Dent J; 2001 Jun; 24(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 11699355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing treatment outcomes for a graduate orthodontics program: follow-up study for the classes of 2001-2003.
    Knierim K; Roberts WE; Hartsfield J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):648-55, 655.e1-3. PubMed ID: 17110263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual application of the American Board of Orthodontics Grading System.
    Scott SA; Freer TJ
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 May; 21(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 16433082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retrospective analysis of long-term stable and unstable orthodontic treatment outcomes.
    Ormiston JP; Huang GJ; Little RM; Decker JD; Seuk GD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):568-74; quiz 669. PubMed ID: 16286203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Outcome of a scheme for specialist orthodontic care.
    Berset GP; Eilertsen IM; Lagerström L; Espeland L; Stenvik A
    Swed Dent J; 2000; 24(1-2):39-48. PubMed ID: 10997760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.
    Soh J; Sandham A; Chan YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16286213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Occlusal outcome in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery with internal fixation.
    Baker NJ; David S; Barnard DW; Birnie DJ; Robinson SN
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Apr; 37(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 10371307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Onyeaso CO; Begole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 17276867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of treatment result and compliance between private practice Medicaid and non-Medicaid orthodontic patients--a brief communication.
    Dickens S; Beane RA; Caplan DJ; Vann W
    J Public Health Dent; 2008; 68(3):167-9. PubMed ID: 18179467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of orthodontists' perception of treatment need and the peer assessment rating (PAR) index.
    McGorray SP; Wheeler TT; Keeling SD; Yurkiewicz L; Taylor MG; King GJ
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 10456600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Orthodontic treatment standards in a public group practice in Sweden.
    Richmond S; Ikonomou C; Williams B; Ramel S; Rolfe B; Kurol J
    Swed Dent J; 2001; 25(4):137-44. PubMed ID: 11862915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.
    Janson G; Barros SE; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):490-8. PubMed ID: 17920502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The duration and sequencing of surgical-orthodontic treatment.
    Proffit WR; Miguel JA
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 9081991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of prospectively and retrospectively selected American Board of Orthodontics cases.
    Struble BH; Huang GJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):6.e1-8; discussion 6-8. PubMed ID: 20122416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Need for training sessions for orthodontists in the use of the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Murakami K; Deguchi T; Hashimoto T; Imai M; Miyawaki S; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):427.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17920490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The excellence challenge in orthodontics: clinical use of an objective grading system for orthodontic cases.
    Cordua T; Ursini R; Giuliante L; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):4-15. PubMed ID: 20545087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vertical facial pattern and orthodontic stability. Part I: Pretreatment vertical pattern and stability.
    Pinto N; Woods M; Crawford E
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Nov; 16(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 12476495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Duration of treatment and occlusal outcome using Damon3 self-ligated and conventional orthodontic bracket systems in extraction patients: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
    DiBiase AT; Nasr IH; Scott P; Cobourne MT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e111-6. PubMed ID: 21300221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Occlusal outcomes and efficiency of 1- and 2-phase protocols in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Cançado RH; Pinzan A; Janson G; Henriques JF; Neves LS; Canuto CE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):245-53; quiz 328.e1-2. PubMed ID: 18249291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.