These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12358126)
1. Removal of the well-bonded distal part of a non-cylindrical broken femoral stem (Autophor 900S) with hollow trephine reamers--report of two cases. Babis GC; Tsarouchas J; Boscainos PJ; Tzagarakis GP; Pantazopoulos T Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Aug; 73(4):478-80. PubMed ID: 12358126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Previously unreported complication of trephine reamers in revision total hip arthroplasty. Austin MS; Klein GR; Pollice PF J Arthroplasty; 2006 Feb; 21(2):299-300. PubMed ID: 16520223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrograde stem removal in revision hip surgery: removing a loose or broken femoral component with a retrograde nail. Tóth K; Sisák K; Nagy J; Manó S; Csernátony Z Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Jul; 130(7):813-8. PubMed ID: 20165860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal of a well-fixed cementless femoral stem using a microsagittal saw. Kim YM; Lim ST; Yoo JJ; Kim HJ J Arthroplasty; 2003 Jun; 18(4):511-2. PubMed ID: 12820097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems. Fink B; Grossmann A Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 17345026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new strategy to remove broken femoral mega-prostheses with hollow trephine reamers. Tanaka T; Hamada K; Oshima K; Joyama S; Naka N; Araki N Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 Apr; 23(3):357-60. PubMed ID: 23412286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Longitudinal and axial stability of a cementless metaphyseal versus a fully porous coated cylindrical femoral stem. Rivera VR; Parks BG; Boucher HR J Surg Orthop Adv; 2009; 18(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 19602338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intrapelvic migration of the trial femoral head during total hip arthroplasty: is retrieval necessary? A report of four cases. Callaghan JJ; McAndrew C; Boese CK; Forest E Iowa Orthop J; 2006; 26():60-2. PubMed ID: 16789451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of 16 retrieved proximally cemented femoral stems. Jones RE; Willie BM; Hayes H; Bloebaum RD J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jan; 20(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 15660065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A technique for removal of broken cannulated tricortical syndesmotic screws. Melvin JS; Downing KL; Ogilvie CM J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Oct; 22(9):648-51. PubMed ID: 18827596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histological findings of the femoral bone after cement removal in hip revision. An experimental study of cadaver femurs with two different cement removal procedures. Porsch M; Schmidt J Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):199-202. PubMed ID: 12743715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Removal of broken distal intramedullary nail with a simple method: a case report. Georgilas I; Mouzopoulos G; Neila C; Morakis E; Tzurbakis M Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):203-5. PubMed ID: 18297295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years. McInnis DP; Horne G; Devane PA J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 16627145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Per-operative vibration analysis: a valuable tool for defining correct stem insertion: preliminary report. Mulier M; Pastrav C; Van der Perre G Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2008; 10(6):576-82. PubMed ID: 19153546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]