571 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12358404)
1. The pulmonary bioprosthetic heart valve: its unsuitability for use as an aortic valve replacement.
Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Booth C; Watterson KG; Fisher J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):668-78; discussion 679. PubMed ID: 12358404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of sizing and method of fixation on the hydrodynamic function of stentless, free-hand inserted porcine bioprosthesis: an in vitro study.
Revanna P; Fisher J; Watterson KG
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 9263877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics of the porcine pulmonary valve and root with regard to the ross procedure.
Nagy ZL; Fisher J; Walker PG; Watterson KG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Aug; 120(2):284-9. PubMed ID: 10917944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In-vitro assessment of the functional performance of the decellularized intact porcine aortic root.
Korossis SA; Wilcox HE; Watterson KG; Kearney JN; Ingham E; Fisher J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 May; 14(3):408-21; discussion 422. PubMed ID: 15974537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The changing hydrodynamic performance of the decellularized intact porcine aortic root: considerations on in-vitro testing.
Bottio T; Tarzia V; Dal Lin C; Buratto E; Rizzoli G; Spina M; Gandaglia A; Naso F; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jul; 19(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 20845897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glycosaminoglycan-degrading enzymes in porcine aortic heart valves: implications for bioprosthetic heart valve degeneration.
Simionescu DT; Lovekamp JJ; Vyavahare NR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 12701795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of free hand suturing technique and zero pressure fixation on the hydrodynamic function of aortic root and aortic valve leaflets.
Revanna P; Fisher J; Watterson KG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1997 Feb; 11(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 9080156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Degeneration of bioprosthetic heart valve cusp and wall tissues is initiated during tissue preparation: an ultrastructural study.
Simionescu DT; Lovekamp JJ; Vyavahare NR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 12701796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Porcine aortic wall flexibility. Fresh vs Denacol fixed vs glutaraldehyde fixed.
Zhou J; Quintero LJ; Helmus MN; Lee C; Kafesjian R
ASAIO J; 1997; 43(5):M470-5. PubMed ID: 9360087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tissue engineering of cardiac valve prostheses II: biomechanical characterization of decellularized porcine aortic heart valves.
Korossis SA; Booth C; Wilcox HE; Watterson KG; Kearney JN; Fisher J; Ingham E
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 12150291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An assessment of the mechanical properties of leaflets from four second-generation porcine bioprostheses with biaxial testing techniques.
Mayne AS; Christie GW; Smaill BH; Hunter PJ; Barratt-Boyes BG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Aug; 98(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 2755150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fixation-related autolysis and bioprosthetic aortic wall calcification.
Human P; Weissenstein C; Trantina A; Zilla P
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Sep; 10(5):656-65. PubMed ID: 11603606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves.
Marquez S; Hon RT; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 11767190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Harvested porcine mitral xenograft fixation: impact on fluid dynamic performance.
Jensen MO; Lemmon JD; Gessaghi VC; Conrad CP; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 11206757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biaxial strain distributions in explanted porcine bioprosthetic valves.
Adamczyk MM; Vesely I
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):688-95. PubMed ID: 12358406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frame-mounted porcine valve bioprostheses: preparation during aortic-root dilation. Biomechanics and design considerations.
Butterfield M; Fisher J; Lockie KJ; Davies GA; Watterson K
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Dec; 106(6):1181-8. PubMed ID: 8246557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
