BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12361064)

  • 1. Bite forces in patients after treatment of mandibular angle fractures with miniplate osteosynthesis according to Champy.
    Gerlach KL; Schwarz A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Aug; 31(4):345-8. PubMed ID: 12361064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Load resistance of mandibular angle fracturs treated with a miniplate osteosynthesis].
    Gerlach KL; Schwarz A
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2003 Jul; 7(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 12961075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process.
    Wagner A; Krach W; Schicho K; Undt G; Ploder O; Ewers R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Dec; 94(6):678-86. PubMed ID: 12464890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bite forces after open or closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures.
    Ellis E; Throckmorton GS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 59(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 11289168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combination of microplate and miniplate for osteosynthesis of mandibular fractures: an experimental study.
    Feller KU; Richter G; Schneider M; Eckelt U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Feb; 31(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11936405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of different miniplates for internal fixation of mandible fractures using finite element analysis.
    Arbag H; Korkmaz HH; Ozturk K; Uyar Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1225-32. PubMed ID: 18486788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is the use of arch bars or interdental wire fixation necessary for successful outcomes in the open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures?
    Bell RB; Wilson DM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2116-22. PubMed ID: 18848111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bite force evaluation of mandibular fractures treated with microplates and miniplates.
    Gupta A; Singh V; Mohammad S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1903-8. PubMed ID: 22695018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Long-term outcome after intraoral miniplate osteosynthesis in mandibular angle fractures].
    Kakoschke D; Mohr C; Schettler D
    Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1996; 41():91-4. PubMed ID: 8755410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computerized analysis of resorbable polymer plates and screws for the rigid fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
    Cox T; Kohn MW; Impelluso T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr; 61(4):481-7; discussion 487-8. PubMed ID: 12684967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of different miniplates in fixation of fractured human mandible with the finite element method.
    Korkmaz HH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jun; 103(6):e1-13. PubMed ID: 17468022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transoral 2.0-mm locking miniplate fixation of mandibular fractures plus 1 week of maxillomandibular fixation: a prospective study.
    Chritah A; Lazow SK; Berger JR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1737-41. PubMed ID: 16297694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures: a comparison of 2 techniques.
    Mehra P; Murad H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 66(11):2254-60. PubMed ID: 18940489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system: an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model.
    Shetty V; McBrearty D; Fourney M; Caputo AA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Jul; 53(7):791-801; discussion 801-2. PubMed ID: 7595794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical comparison of different plating techniques in repair of mandibular angle fractures.
    Alkan A; Celebi N; Ozden B; Baş B; Inal S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Dec; 104(6):752-6. PubMed ID: 17651992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of straight and curved 3-dimensional titanium miniplates for fracture fixation at the mandibular angle.
    Zix J; Lieger O; Iizuka T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 65(9):1758-63. PubMed ID: 17719394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of monocortical miniplates for the intraoral treatment of mandibular fractures.
    Chiodo TA; Milles M
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2009 Mar; 17(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 19237124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of plating techniques for fractures of the mandibular condyle.
    Alkan A; Metin M; Muğlali M; Ozden B; Celebi N
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16777278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fixation of mandibular angle fractures with a 2.0-mm 3-dimensional curved angle strut plate.
    Guimond C; Johnson JV; Marchena JM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Feb; 63(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 15690289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures.
    Gear AJ; Apasova E; Schmitz JP; Schubert W
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 15883941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.