274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12361065)
1. Development of a three-dimensional treatment planning system based on computed tomographic data.
Troulis MJ; Everett P; Seldin EB; Kikinis R; Kaban LB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Aug; 31(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 12361065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Theoretical considerations for the surgical correction of mandibular deformity in hemifacial microsomia patients using multifocal distraction osteogenesis.
Kunz C; Brauchli L; Moehle T; Rahn B; Hammer B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):364-8. PubMed ID: 12618978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional analysis and treatment planning of hemimandibular hyperplasia.
Pelo S; Correra P; Gasparini G; Marianetti TM; Cervelli D; Grippaudo C; Boniello R; Azzuni C; Deli R; Moro A
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2227-34. PubMed ID: 22134255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro study of the accuracy of a new protocol for planning distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.
Gateno J; Allen ME; Teichgraeber JF; Messersmith ML
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Sep; 58(9):985-90; discussion 990-1. PubMed ID: 10981978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Error analysis of a CAD/CAM method for unidirectional mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia.
Sun H; Li B; Zhao Z; Zhang L; Shen SG; Wang X
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):892-7. PubMed ID: 23583007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of stereolithographic drilling and cutting guides in bilateral mandibular distraction.
Seeberger R; Davids R; Kater W; Thiele OC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2031-5. PubMed ID: 22067855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Preoperative accuracy of selective laser sintering (SLS) in craniofacial 3D modeling: comparison with patient CT data].
Kaim AH; Kirsch EC; Alder P; Bucher P; Hammer B
Rofo; 2009 Jul; 181(7):644-51. PubMed ID: 19253203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Condyle as the point of rotation for 3-D planning of distraction osteogenesis for hemifacial microsomia.
Paeng JY; Lee JH; Lee JH; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 35(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 17448668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Navigation-assisted mandibular body distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary study in goats.
Cai M; Shen G; Cheng AH; Lin Y; Yu D; Ye M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):168.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24331570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-Dimensional Analysis and Surgical Planning in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery.
Steinbacher DM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 73(12 Suppl):S40-56. PubMed ID: 26608154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A computer-assisted approach to planning multidimensional distraction osteogenesis.
Yeshwant KC; Seldin EB; Kikinis R; Kaban LB
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2005 Mar; 13(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 15820426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted surgery in therapeutic strategy distraction osteogenesis of hemifacial microsomia: Accuracy and predictability.
Tan A; Chai Y; Mooi W; Chen X; Xu H; Zin MA; Lin L; Zhang Y; Yang X; Chai G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Feb; 47(2):204-218. PubMed ID: 30583926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of skeletal movements in mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Yeshwant K; Seldin EB; Gateno J; Everett P; White CL; Kikinis R; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 15742283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional computer-assisted simulation combining facial skeleton with facial morphology for orthognathic surgery.
Chen LH; Chen WH
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 10686837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with multidirectional extraoral distraction device in hemifacial microsomia patients: three-dimensional treatment planning, prediction tracings, and case outcomes.
Tharanon W; Sinn DP
J Craniofac Surg; 1999 May; 10(3):202-13. PubMed ID: 10530229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel Treatment Planning of Hemimandibular Hyperplasia by the Use of Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided-Design and Computer-Aided-Manufacturing Technologies.
Hatamleh MM; Yeung E; Osher J; Huppa C
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 May; 28(3):764-767. PubMed ID: 28468161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional virtual operations can facilitate complicated surgical planning for the treatment of patients with jaw deformities associated with facial asymmetry: a case report.
Hara S; Mitsugi M; Kanno T; Nomachi A; Wajima T; Tatemoto Y
Int J Oral Sci; 2013 Sep; 5(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 23907678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Precise positioning of an intraoral distractor using augmented reality in patients with hemifacial microsomia.
Qu M; Hou Y; Xu Y; Shen C; Zhu M; Xie L; Wang H; Zhang Y; Chai G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 43(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 25465484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preliminary development of a workstation for craniomaxillofacial surgical procedures: introducing a computer-assisted planning and execution system.
Gordon CR; Murphy RJ; Coon D; Basafa E; Otake Y; Al Rakan M; Rada E; Susarla S; Swanson E; Fishman E; Santiago G; Brandacher G; Liacouras P; Grant G; Armand M
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):273-83. PubMed ID: 24406592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two computer-assisted surgery techniques to guide a mandibular distraction osteogenesis procedure. Technical note.
d'Hauthuille C; Taha F; Devauchelle B; Testelin S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 15695051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
