These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12361858)
21. MEG study on neural activities associated with syntactic and semantic violations in spoken Korean sentences. Kwon H; Kuriki S; Kim JM; Lee YH; Kim K; Nam K Neurosci Res; 2005 Apr; 51(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15740798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Localization of the syntactic mismatch negativity in the temporal cortex: an MEG study. Herrmann B; Maess B; Hasting AS; Friederici AD Neuroimage; 2009 Nov; 48(3):590-600. PubMed ID: 19595773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An event-related brain potential study of sentence comprehension in preschoolers: semantic and morphosyntactic processing. Silva-Pereyra J; Rivera-Gaxiola M; Kuhl PK Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):247-58. PubMed ID: 15820632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models. Callan DE; Jones JA; Callan AM; Akahane-Yamada R Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1182-94. PubMed ID: 15219590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Native and non-native reading of sentences: an fMRI experiment. Rüschemeyer SA; Zysset S; Friederici AD Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):354-65. PubMed ID: 16427323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The brain generates its own sentence melody: a Gestalt phenomenon in speech perception. Herrmann CS; Friederici AD; Oertel U; Maess B; Hahne A; Alter K Brain Lang; 2003 Jun; 85(3):396-401. PubMed ID: 12744951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of syllabic lengthening on semantic processing in spoken French: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Magne C; Astésano C; Aramaki M; Ystad S; Kronland-Martinet R; Besson M Cereb Cortex; 2007 Nov; 17(11):2659-68. PubMed ID: 17264253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Localization of electrophysiological responses to semantic and syntactic anomalies in language comprehension with MEG. Kielar A; Panamsky L; Links KA; Meltzer JA Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 105():507-24. PubMed ID: 25463470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Magnetoencephalography Reveals Mismatch Field Enhancement from Unexpected Syntactic Category Errors in English Sentences. Kubota M; Ono Y; Ishiyama A; Zouridakis G; Papanicolaou AC Neurosci Lett; 2018 Jan; 662():195-204. PubMed ID: 28847487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Is animacy special? ERP correlates of semantic violations and animacy violations in sentence processing. Szewczyk JM; Schriefers H Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1368():208-21. PubMed ID: 21029726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is the P600/SPS affected by the richness of semantic content? A linguistic ERP study in Swedish. Ericsson E; Olofsson JK; Nordin S; Rudolfsson T; Sandström G Scand J Psychol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18190397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Friederici AD; Rüschemeyer SA; Hahne A; Fiebach CJ Cereb Cortex; 2003 Feb; 13(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 12507948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Rules and heuristics during sentence comprehension: evidence from a dual-task brain potential study. Martín-Loeches M; Schacht A; Casado P; Hohlfeld A; Abdel Rahman R; Sommer W J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 21(7):1365-79. PubMed ID: 18752393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The impact of semantic-free second-language training on ERPs during case processing. Mueller JL; Girgsdies S; Friederici AD Neurosci Lett; 2008 Oct; 443(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 18674588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Modulation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) to vowel duration changes in native speakers of Finnish and German as a result of language experience. Kirmse U; Ylinen S; Tervaniemi M; Vainio M; Schröger E; Jacobsen T Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Feb; 67(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 18160160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The masking effect in foreign speech sounds perception revealed by neuromagnetic responses. Koyama S; Gunji A; Yabe H; Yamada RA; Oiwa S; Kubo R; Kakigi R Neuroreport; 2000 Nov; 11(17):3765-9. PubMed ID: 11117487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mapping the brain's orchestration during speech comprehension: task-specific facilitation of regional synchrony in neural networks. Härle M; Rockstroh BS; Keil A; Wienbruch C; Elbert TR BMC Neurosci; 2004 Oct; 5():40. PubMed ID: 15500698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Statistical learning of an auditory sequence and reorganization of acquired knowledge: A time course of word segmentation and ordering. Daikoku T; Yatomi Y; Yumoto M Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 95():1-10. PubMed ID: 27939187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Auditory evoked fields to vocalization during passive listening and active generation in adults who stutter. Beal DS; Cheyne DO; Gracco VL; Quraan MA; Taylor MJ; De Nil LF Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1645-53. PubMed ID: 20452437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]