These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12362430)
1. Ingeneue: a versatile tool for reconstituting genetic networks, with examples from the segment polarity network. Meir E; Munro EM; Odell GM; Von Dassow G J Exp Zool; 2002 Oct; 294(3):216-51. PubMed ID: 12362430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ingeneue: a software tool to simulate and explore genetic regulatory networks. Kim KJ Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 500():169-200. PubMed ID: 19399429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Qualitative simulation of genetic regulatory networks using piecewise-linear models. De Jong H; Gouzé JL; Hernandez C; Page M; Sari T; Geiselmann J Bull Math Biol; 2004 Mar; 66(2):301-40. PubMed ID: 14871568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulating genetic networks made easy: network construction with simple building blocks. Vercruysse S; Kuiper M Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(2):269-71. PubMed ID: 15319258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetdes: automatic design of transcriptional networks. Rodrigo G; Carrera J; Jaramillo A Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(14):1857-8. PubMed ID: 17485427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the attenuation and amplification of molecular noise in genetic regulatory networks. Chen BS; Wang YC BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():52. PubMed ID: 16457708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating the dynamic behavior of biochemical networks using model families. Haunschild MD; Freisleben B; Takors R; Wiechert W Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(8):1617-25. PubMed ID: 15604106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stabilizing patterning in the Drosophila segment polarity network by selecting models in silico. Stoll G; Bischofberger M; Rougemont J; Naef F Biosystems; 2010 Oct; 102(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 20655356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. GINsim: a software suite for the qualitative modelling, simulation and analysis of regulatory networks. Gonzalez AG; Naldi A; Sánchez L; Thieffry D; Chaouiya C Biosystems; 2006 May; 84(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 16434137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic network identification using convex programming. Julius A; Zavlanos M; Boyd S; Pappas GJ IET Syst Biol; 2009 May; 3(3):155-66. PubMed ID: 19449976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robustness and fragility of Boolean models for genetic regulatory networks. Chaves M; Albert R; Sontag ED J Theor Biol; 2005 Aug; 235(3):431-49. PubMed ID: 15882705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An analytical study of the number of steady states in gene regulatory networks. Mochizuki A J Theor Biol; 2005 Oct; 236(3):291-310. PubMed ID: 15885706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Superiority of network motifs over optimal networks and an application to the revelation of gene network evolution. Ott S; Hansen A; Kim SY; Miyano S Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(2):227-38. PubMed ID: 15377501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Maere S; Heymans K; Kuiper M Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(16):3448-9. PubMed ID: 15972284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]