These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12363183)

  • 1. What about upwind buffer zones for aerial applications?
    Kirk LW; Teske ME; Thistle HW
    J Agric Saf Health; 2002 Aug; 8(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 12363183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the AgDISP aerial spray algorithms in the AgDRIFT model.
    Bird SL; Perry SG; Ray SL; Teske ME
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Mar; 21(3):672-81. PubMed ID: 11878481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AgDRIFT: a model for estimating near-field spray drift from aerial applications.
    Teske ME; Bird SL; Esterly DM; Curbishley TB; Ray SL; Perry SG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Mar; 21(3):659-71. PubMed ID: 11878480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
    Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spray drift of pesticides arising from aerial application in cotton.
    Woods N; Craig IP; Dorr G; Young B
    J Environ Qual; 2001; 30(3):697-701. PubMed ID: 11401259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting aerial spray drift in the Brazilian Cerrado.
    Baio FHR; Antuniassi UR; Castilho BR; Teodoro PE; Silva EED
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212289. PubMed ID: 30779797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of the spray drift task force database for aerial applications.
    Hewitt AJ; Johnson DR; Fish JD; Hermansky CG; Valcore DL
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Mar; 21(3):648-58. PubMed ID: 11878479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Buffer zones for reducing pesticide drift to ditches and risks to aquatic organisms.
    de Snoo GR; de Wit PJ
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1998 Sep; 41(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 9756699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift.
    Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18399426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulation of drift of pesticides: development and validation of a model.
    Brusselman E; Spanoghe P; Van der Meeren P; Gabriels D; Steurbaut W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2003; 68(4 Pt B):749-58. PubMed ID: 15151311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-Time Monitoring of Spray Drift from Three Different Orchard Sprayers.
    Blanco MN; Fenske RA; Kasner EJ; Yost MG; Seto E; Austin E
    Chemosphere; 2019 May; 222():46-55. PubMed ID: 30690400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spray droplet size, drift potential, and risks to nontarget organisms from aerially applied glyphosate for coca control in Colombia.
    Hewitt AJ; Solomon KR; Marshall EJ
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(15-16):921-9. PubMed ID: 19672760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spray drift as affected by meteorological conditions.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 16628942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of different sampling techniques for the evaluation of pesticide spray drift in apple orchards.
    Briand O; Bertrand F; Seux R; Millet M
    Sci Total Environ; 2002 Apr; 288(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 11991524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Herbicide spray drift from ground and aerial applications: Implications for potential pollinator foraging sources.
    Butts TR; Fritz BK; Kouame KB; Norsworthy JK; Barber LT; Ross WJ; Lorenz GM; Thrash BC; Bateman NR; Adamczyk JJ
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):18017. PubMed ID: 36289439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of emission fluxes from a horizontal flux budget method, exemplified with determination of pesticide volatilization.
    Jensen NO; Andersen HV
    Environ Pollut; 2008 Nov; 156(1):193-8. PubMed ID: 18262316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 2: field experiments.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):723-7. PubMed ID: 19226820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the AGDISP model for predicting airborne atrazine spray drift: A South African ground application case study.
    Nsibande SA; Dabrowski JM; van der Walt E; Venter A; Forbes PB
    Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():454-61. PubMed ID: 26171732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of realtime spray drift using RTDrift Gaussian advection-diffusion model.
    Lebeau F; Verstraete A; Schiffers B; Destain MF
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 20218507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary and secondary pesticide drift profiles from a peach orchard.
    Zivan O; Bohbot-Raviv Y; Dubowski Y
    Chemosphere; 2017 Jun; 177():303-310. PubMed ID: 28314235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.