520 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12363214)
1. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Campbell DL; Jensen PA; Myers WR
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 12363214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Campbell DL; Zhuang Z; Calvert CA; Jensen PA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Apr; 1(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15204866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Lee K; Slavcev A; Nicas M
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 15202153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Errors associated with three methods of assessing respirator fit.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Duling MG; Campbell DL
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Jan; 3(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 16485349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total inward leakage measurement of particulates for N95 filtering facepiece respirators--a comparison study.
Rengasamy S; Walbert GF; Newcomb WE; Faulkner K; Rengasamy MM; Brannen JJ; Szalajda JV
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Mar; 58(2):206-16. PubMed ID: 24107745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators by photometric and number-based test methods.
Rengasamy S; Miller A; Eimer BC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jan; 8(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 21154105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a quantitative fit testing method for N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Janssen L; Luinenburg MD; Mullins HE; Danisch SG; Nelson TJ
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 12908863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of subject characteristics and respirator features on respirator fit.
Zhuang Z; Coffey CC; Ann RB
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Dec; 2(12):641-9. PubMed ID: 16298949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-certified particulate air-purifying filtering facepiece respirators: evaluation by light scattering photometric and particle number-based test methods.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 22239104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nanoparticle penetration through filter media and leakage through face seal interface of N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):568-80. PubMed ID: 22294504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-approved and CE-marked particulate filtering facepiece respirators.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 19261695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the performance of the N95-companion: effects of filter penetration and comparison with other aerosol instruments.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(7):417-26. PubMed ID: 22642759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of pressure drop and filtration efficiency of particulate respirators using welding fumes and sodium chloride.
Cho HW; Yoon CS; Lee JH; Lee SJ; Viner A; Johnson EW
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):666-80. PubMed ID: 21742627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of total inward leakage for NIOSH-approved elastomeric half-facepiece, full-facepiece, and powered air-purifying respirators using sodium chloride and corn oil aerosols.
Rengasamy S; Zhuang Z; Lawrence RB; Boutin B; Yorio P; Horvatin M; McClain C; Harris JR; Coffey C
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2021 Jul; 18(7):305-313. PubMed ID: 34038318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 and P100 filtering facepiece respirators against 4 to 30 nanometer-size nanoparticles.
Rengasamy S; King WP; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Sep; 5(9):556-64. PubMed ID: 18607812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fit testing respirators for public health medical emergencies.
Brosseau LM
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Nov; 7(11):628-32. PubMed ID: 20853203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles.
Balazy A; Toivola M; Reponen T; Podgórski A; Zimmer A; Grinshpun SA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):259-69. PubMed ID: 16344291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Capability of respirator wearers to detect aerosolized qualitative fit test agents (sweetener and Bitrex) with known fixed leaks.
McKay RT; Davies E
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Jun; 15(6):479-84. PubMed ID: 10853288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
