BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12365299)

  • 1. Preventing exacerbation of an ADE with automated decision support.
    Galanter WL; DiDomenico RJ; Polikaitis A
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2002; 16(4):44-9. PubMed ID: 12365299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physicians' decisions to override computerized drug alerts in primary care.
    Weingart SN; Toth M; Sands DZ; Aronson MD; Davis RB; Phillips RS
    Arch Intern Med; 2003 Nov; 163(21):2625-31. PubMed ID: 14638563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changing hospital culture, systems reduces drug errors.
    Hume M
    Exec Solut Healthc Manag; 1999 Apr; 2(4):1, 4-9. PubMed ID: 10351629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated dosing. Computerized physician order entry reduces risk of medication and dosing errors in neonatal ICU.
    Lillis K
    Health Manag Technol; 2003 Nov; 24(11):36-7. PubMed ID: 14608711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided drug selection can sharply cut adverse events.
    Hume M
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1999 Mar; 11(3):10-2. PubMed ID: 10351584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A measured dose of safety. Addressing adverse drug events is among first steps prescribed as Trinity health installs an electronic medical record system.
    Gardner E
    Mod Healthc; 2003 Feb; 33(8):32, 34, 36. PubMed ID: 12632860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The business case for medication safety.
    Kinninger T; Reeder L
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2003 Feb; 57(2):46-51. PubMed ID: 12602311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Teaching hospitals to track, prevent drug errors.
    Koska MT
    Hospitals; 1992 Jan; 66(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 1729159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medication safety program reduces adverse drug events in a community hospital.
    Cohen MM; Kimmel NL; Benage MK; Cox MJ; Sanders N; Spence D; Chen J
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2005 Jun; 14(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 15933311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety Awards. Research: David W. Bates, MD, MSc, Brigham and Women's Hospital. Interview by Steven Berman.
    Bates DW
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 2002 Dec; 28(12):651-9, 633. PubMed ID: 12481599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using BPI and emerging technology to improve patient safety.
    Frank L; Galanos H; Penn S; Wetz HF
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2004; 18(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 14971082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Issues of decision support in institutional pharmacy systems.
    Mackowiak LR; Hayward SL
    Pharm Pract Manag Q; 1998 Apr; 18(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 10177541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Raising a red flag. Programs look for wrong combination of events.
    Gardner E
    Mod Healthc; 2003 Feb; 33(8):34. PubMed ID: 12632861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computerized physician order entry and medication errors: finding a balance.
    Bates DW
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Aug; 38(4):259-61. PubMed ID: 15964247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medication errors in pediatrics--the octopus evading defeat.
    Sullivan JE; Buchino JJ
    J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 88(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 15562454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Successful computerized physician order entry system implementation. Tools to support physician-driven design and adoption.
    Williams RB
    Healthc Leadersh Manag Rep; 2002 Oct; 10(10):1-13. PubMed ID: 12506440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CPOE systems: success factors and implementation issues.
    Sengstack PP; Gugerty B
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2004; 18(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 14971078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High rates of adverse drug events in a highly computerized hospital.
    Nebeker JR; Hoffman JM; Weir CR; Bennett CL; Hurdle JF
    Arch Intern Med; 2005 May; 165(10):1111-6. PubMed ID: 15911723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing medication errors and increasing patient safety: case studies in clinical pharmacology.
    Benjamin DM
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2003 Jul; 43(7):768-83. PubMed ID: 12856392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Push technology in the pharmacy. Clinical decision support helps the pharmacy department of a South Carolina medical center automate monitoring of medication effectiveness.
    Amsden D
    Health Manag Technol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 12564140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.