These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1236547)

  • 1. Use of non-medical screeners and effect of low dose on film quality in a breast screening campaign.
    Hartley G
    Proc R Soc Med; 1975 Jul; 68(7):437-8. PubMed ID: 1236547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality control of mammography].
    Endo T
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():324-7. PubMed ID: 17682173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lay screeners in mammographic survey programs.
    Dowdy AH; Lagasse LD; Roach P; Wilson D
    Radiology; 1970 Jun; 95(3):619-21. PubMed ID: 5442669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of non-medical staff in screening for breast cancer.
    George WD; Sellwood RA; Asbury D; Hartley G
    Br Med J; 1980 Jan; 280(6208):147-9. PubMed ID: 7357293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiological aspects of the West London screening programme for breast neoplasms.
    Price JL; Nathan BE
    Proc R Soc Med; 1975 Jul; 68(7):438-40. PubMed ID: 1236548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for breast cancer. Technicians could be trained to interpret screening mammograms.
    Robertson M
    BMJ; 1995 Apr; 310(6985):1003. PubMed ID: 7727995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Causes of erroneous interpretation of breast fluorograms in mass screening of women].
    Dzhancharov DI
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1980 Apr; 25(4):74-5. PubMed ID: 7382765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammography at reduced doses: present performance and future possibilities.
    Muntz EP; Wilkinson E; George FW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Apr; 134(4):741-7. PubMed ID: 6767360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A practical technique for baseline mammography.
    Gurley LT; Harwood SW
    Radiol Technol; 1972; 44(3):138-45. PubMed ID: 4636568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality control in mammography: an initiative in France.
    Maccia C; Renaud R; Castellano S; Schaffer P; Wahl R; Haehnel P; Dale G; Gairard B
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):371-83. PubMed ID: 8173879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative studies on film-, xeroradio- and ultrasound-mammography of breast tumor.
    Inada G; Fujita S; Ishizaki M
    Nagoya Med J; 1969 Dec; 15(4):187-90. PubMed ID: 5373047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of mammography screening for breast cancer].
    Hemmingsen R; Keiding N
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Apr; 167(16):1772-3. PubMed ID: 15898615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Report of the "ad hoc" committee on mammography rapport du comite "ad hoc" sur la mammographie.
    Léger JL; Naimark AP; Béique RA; McFarlane DV; Miller S; Miller AB
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1974 Mar; 25(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 4595875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proper film emulsion for mammography.
    Barnette PA
    Radiol Technol; 1972 May; 43(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 4670968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography screening for breast cancer.
    Med Lett Drugs Ther; 1980 Jun; 22(13):53-4. PubMed ID: 7382906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mammography and Canadian screening].
    Di Maggio C
    Radiol Med; 1992 Sep; 84(3):343-4. PubMed ID: 1410685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quality criteria in Mammography (author's transl)].
    Schneider G; Brezina K; Czech W
    Rontgenblatter; 1979 Nov; 32(11):602-7. PubMed ID: 515651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preliminary evaluation of absorbed dose in mammography. Six views.
    Palmer RC; Egan RL; Barrett BJ
    Radiology; 1970 May; 95(2):395-7. PubMed ID: 5439449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Circumscribed lesions seen at screening mammography.
    Monticciolo DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Oct; 171(4):1154-5. PubMed ID: 9763013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.