These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1236548)
1. Radiological aspects of the West London screening programme for breast neoplasms. Price JL; Nathan BE Proc R Soc Med; 1975 Jul; 68(7):438-40. PubMed ID: 1236548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Current status of the diagnosis of breast cancer. de Paredes ES Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 1985; 14(2):1-54. PubMed ID: 3891237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of radiological screening for breast cancer. Asbury DL; Barker PG Proc R Soc Med; 1975 Jul; 68(7):435-7. PubMed ID: 1236546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Current status of mammography. Crymes JE CRC Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1979; 11(3):297-333. PubMed ID: 383404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [When the screening programme is reticent]. Porqueddu P Epidemiol Prev; 2011; 35(2):70; discussion 70. PubMed ID: 21628745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Report of the "ad hoc" committee on mammography rapport du comite "ad hoc" sur la mammographie. Léger JL; Naimark AP; Béique RA; McFarlane DV; Miller S; Miller AB J Can Assoc Radiol; 1974 Mar; 25(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 4595875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comments on the article "Focus measurement and geometric lack of focus in mammography equipment"]. Andersson O Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Nov; 4(6):351-2. PubMed ID: 7819303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mammography for mass screening]. van Bekkum DW Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1978 Apr; 122(17):600-4. PubMed ID: 652071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography at reduced doses: present performance and future possibilities. Muntz EP; Wilkinson E; George FW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Apr; 134(4):741-7. PubMed ID: 6767360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammography and screening for breast cancer. Tan EL Singapore Med J; 1993 Oct; 34(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 8153685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality control in mammography: an initiative in France. Maccia C; Renaud R; Castellano S; Schaffer P; Wahl R; Haehnel P; Dale G; Gairard B Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):371-83. PubMed ID: 8173879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of non-medical screeners and effect of low dose on film quality in a breast screening campaign. Hartley G Proc R Soc Med; 1975 Jul; 68(7):437-8. PubMed ID: 1236547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Mammography with minimal radiation dosage. Comparative studies on various imaging systems]. Weissleder H; Kiefer H Rofo; 1977 Jun; 126(6):520-8. PubMed ID: 142713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Causes of erroneous interpretation of breast fluorograms in mass screening of women]. Dzhancharov DI Med Radiol (Mosk); 1980 Apr; 25(4):74-5. PubMed ID: 7382765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiography of the female breast and axilla. With special reference to diagnosis of mammary carcinoma. Bjurstam NG Acta Radiol Suppl; 1978; 357():1-131. PubMed ID: 233589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Error-rates in screening for breast cancer by clinical examination and mammography. Chamberlain J; Clifford RE; Nathan BE; Price JL; Burn I Clin Oncol; 1979 Jun; 5(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 466892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Declining screening mammography rates: a multigenerational loss of opportunity? Carlos RC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):388-9. PubMed ID: 19155399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Mammography as a method for early diagnosis of female breast cancer. Experiences with a screening test in 7380 apparently healthy women]. Scherer E; Seifert J Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1971 Jul; 96(29):1207-10. PubMed ID: 4326980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]