161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12365714)
1. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 non-contact tonometer.
Lawson-Kopp W; DeJong A; Yudcovitch L; Williams S; Kohl P; Yolton RL
Optometry; 2002 Feb; 73(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 12365714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical comparison of air-puff and Goldmann tonometers.
Brencher HL; Kohl P; Reinke AR; Yolton RL
J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 May; 62(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 1822985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000, American Optical MkII and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
Mackie SW; Jay JL; Ackerley R; Walsh G
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 8762780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler PULSAIR 2000 tonometer.
Pearce CD; Kohl P; Yolton RL
J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Feb; 63(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1583262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of five portable tonometers.
Wingert TA; Bassi CJ; McAlister WH; Galanis JC
J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):670-4. PubMed ID: 8576531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
Moseley MJ; Evans NM; Fielder AR
Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 3)():332-7. PubMed ID: 2612679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Reproducibility of the results of two non-contact tonometers. Comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
Gräf M; Hoffmann OF
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Jun; 200(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 1507794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of tonometry with the Keeler air puff non-contact tonometer "Pulsair" and the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
Yücel AA; Stürmer J; Gloor B
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 2280569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and reliability of the Keeler Pulsair EasyEye non-contact tonometer.
Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18174841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by non-contact air puff versus Goldmann applanation tonometers in gas-filled vitrectomized eyes.
Patikulsila D; Taweemankongsab S; Ngamtipakorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 May; 86(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 12859105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
Cho P; Lui T
Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 74(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 9148267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deterioration in the accuracy of the pulsair non-contact tonometer with use: need for regular calibration.
Atkinson PL; Wishart PK; James JN; Vernon SA; Reid F
Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():530-4. PubMed ID: 1286721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
Moseley MJ; Thompson JR; Deutsch J; Misson GP; Naylor G; Tan-Yee A; Taylor RH; Fielder AR
Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():127-30. PubMed ID: 8325401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The accuracy of continued clinical use of goldmann applanation tonometers with known calibration errors.
Sandhu SS; Chattopadhyay S; Amariotakis GA; Skarmoutsos F; Birch MK; Ray-Chaudhuri N
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18801579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra-eye pressure range and pulse profiles in normals with the Pulsair non-contact tonometer.
Vernon SA
Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():134-7. PubMed ID: 8325403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer.
Davies LN; Bartlett H; Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 16637838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Luneau SA disposable and Goldmann applanation tonometer readings.
Baddon AC; Osborne SF; Quah SA; Batterbury M; Wong D
Eye (Lond); 2007 Jun; 21(6):789-92. PubMed ID: 16628242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Proview phosphene tonometer fails to measure ocular pressure accurately in clinical practice.
Alvarez TL; Gollance SA; Thomas GA; Greene RJ; Marchetto PM; Moore EJ; Realini T; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Lama P; Fechtner RD
Ophthalmology; 2004 Jun; 111(6):1077-85. PubMed ID: 15177956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Prospective comparison of the new indentation tonometer TGdC-01, the non-contact tonometer PT100 and the conventional Goldmann applanation tonometer].
Müller A; Godenschweger L; Lang GE; Kampmeier J
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Sep; 221(9):762-8. PubMed ID: 15459844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of intraocular pressure measurement by three tonometers in normal subjects.
Prabhakar SK; Mahesh BS; Shanthamallappa M
Nepal J Ophthalmol; 2013; 5(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 24172555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
