These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12366028)

  • 1. Occurrence of finite-time singularities in epidemic models of rupture, earthquakes, and starquakes.
    Sornette D; Helmstetter A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2002 Oct; 89(15):158501. PubMed ID: 12366028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anomalous power law distribution of total lifetimes of branching processes: application to earthquake aftershock sequences.
    Saichev A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Oct; 70(4 Pt 2):046123. PubMed ID: 15600476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diffusion of epicenters of earthquake aftershocks, Omori's law, and generalized continuous-time random walk models.
    Helmstetter A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2002 Dec; 66(6 Pt 1):061104. PubMed ID: 12513267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distribution of the largest aftershocks in branching models of triggered seismicity: theory of the universal Båth law.
    Saichev A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 May; 71(5 Pt 2):056127. PubMed ID: 16089622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical physics models for aftershocks and induced seismicity.
    Luginbuhl M; Rundle JB; Turcotte DL
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2018 Nov; 377(2136):. PubMed ID: 30478209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Properties of foreshocks and aftershocks of the nonconservative self-organized critical Olami-Feder-Christensen model.
    Helmstetter A; Hergarten S; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Oct; 70(4 Pt 2):046120. PubMed ID: 15600473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No evidence of magnitude clustering in an aftershock sequence of nano- and picoseismicity.
    Davidsen J; Kwiatek G; Dresen G
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Jan; 108(3):038501. PubMed ID: 22400793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu islands earthquake swarm that stressing rate governs seismicity.
    Toda S; Stein RS; Sagiya T
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6902):58-61. PubMed ID: 12214230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aftershocks in a frictional earthquake model.
    Braun OM; Tosatti E
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Sep; 90(3):032403. PubMed ID: 25314453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forecasting the magnitude of the largest expected earthquake.
    Shcherbakov R; Zhuang J; Zöller G; Ogata Y
    Nat Commun; 2019 Sep; 10(1):4051. PubMed ID: 31492839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scale-free networks of earthquakes and aftershocks.
    Baiesi M; Paczuski M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Jun; 69(6 Pt 2):066106. PubMed ID: 15244666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A selective phenomenology of the seismicity of Southern California.
    Knopoff L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(9):3756-63. PubMed ID: 11607661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Foreshock and aftershocks in simple earthquake models.
    Kazemian J; Tiampo KF; Klein W; Dominguez R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Feb; 114(8):088501. PubMed ID: 25768785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysing the 1811-1812 New Madrid earthquakes with recent instrumentally recorded aftershocks.
    Mueller K; Hough SE; Bilham R
    Nature; 2004 May; 429(6989):284-8. PubMed ID: 15152249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hierarchical block model for earthquakes.
    Mykulyak SV
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Jun; 97(6-1):062130. PubMed ID: 30011515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical origin of aftershocks.
    Lippiello E; Giacco F; Marzocchi W; Godano C; de Arcangelis L
    Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15560. PubMed ID: 26497720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unified scaling law for earthquakes.
    Bak P; Christensen K; Danon L; Scanlon T
    Phys Rev Lett; 2002 Apr; 88(17):178501. PubMed ID: 12005787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Universal mean moment rate profiles of earthquake ruptures.
    Mehta AP; Dahmen KA; Ben-Zion Y
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 May; 73(5 Pt 2):056104. PubMed ID: 16802995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implications of an inverse branching aftershock sequence model.
    Turcotte DL; Abaimov SG; Dobson I; Rundle JB
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Jan; 79(1 Pt 2):016101. PubMed ID: 19257101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No Significant Effect of Coulomb Stress on the Gutenberg-Richter Law after the Landers Earthquake.
    Navas-Portella V; Jiménez A; Corral Á
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2901. PubMed ID: 32075986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.