167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12366667)
21. [Application of transvaginal external fascia trachelectomy in the treatment of CIN and micro-invasive cervical cancer].
Zeng SY; Liang MR; Li LY; Li L; Jiang W; Zhong ML
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 35(7):543-6. PubMed ID: 24257310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatment and outcome of stage Ia1 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Haller H; Krašević M; Mamula O; Brnčić-Fischer A; Eminović S; Manestar M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Apr; 113(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 21315348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Oncologic and obstetric outcomes after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ or stage IA1 cervical cancer.
Wang X; Bi Y; Wu H; Wu M; Li L
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19920. PubMed ID: 33199765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Can it replace cold knife conization?
Eduardo AM; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Yandell RB; Schnadig VJ
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):729-32. PubMed ID: 8913973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analysis of treatment modalities and prognosis on microinvasive cervical cancer: a 10-year cohort study in China.
Qian Q; Yang J; Cao D; You Y; Chen J; Shen K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 25142622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure or Cervical Conization to Exclude Cervical Cancer Before Simple Hysterectomy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Peterson P
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Apr; 24(2):202-205. PubMed ID: 32243315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization and hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Murta EF; Silva AO; Silva EA
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2006; 27(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 16550969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The oncological and obstetric outcomes of cervical squamous cell carcinoma at stage IA1 managed with the loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Chen S; Liu J; Shi C; Gao X; Bai H
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 60(4):718-722. PubMed ID: 34247813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.
Diaz ES; Aoyama C; Baquing MA; Beavis A; Silva E; Holschneider C; Cass I
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24262876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of office loop electrosurgical conization and cold knife conization.
Saidi MH; Setzler FD; Sadler RK; Farhart SA; Akright BD
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1994 Feb; 1(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 9050476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laser CO(2) conization: a safe mode of treating conservatively microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Diakomanolis E; Haidopoulos D; Rodolakis A; Vlachos G; Stefanidis K; Komisopoulos K; Michalas S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Apr; 113(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 15063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Unexpected tumor progression after conization for carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Omatsu K; Takeshima N; Matoda M; Nomura H; Umayahara K; Sugiyama Y; Utsugi K; Tanaka H; Akiyama F; Takizawa K
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jan; 38(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 21917067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Management of stage Ia1 squamous cervical cancer and the importance of excision margins: a retrospective study of long-term outcome after 25 years of follow-up.
Papakonstantinou K; Kyrgiou M; Lyons D; Soutter WP; Ghaem-Maghami S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):625.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24949540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Safety of less aggressive surgery for stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.
Lee JY; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 May; 40(5):1382-8. PubMed ID: 24689464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Conization and radical vaginal trachelectomy with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in fertility-sparing surgical treatment of cervical cancer].
Basta P; Jach R; Laskowicz L; Kotlarz A; Schwarz J
Ginekol Pol; 2015 Aug; 86(8):590-7. PubMed ID: 26492707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Post-Conization FIGO stage IA1 squamous cell cervical carcinoma; is hysterectomy necessary?
Escamilla Galindo EP; Medina Ramos NF; Santana Mateo YL; Armas Roca M; Molero Sala L; León Arencibia L; Arencibia Sánchez O; Martín Martínez AI
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Sep; 264():368-373. PubMed ID: 34399105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Conservative conization for microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix.
Tseng CJ; Horng SG; Soong YK; Hsueh S; Hsieh CH; Lin HW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 May; 176(5):1009-10. PubMed ID: 9166160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.
Casarin J; Buda A; Bogani G; Fanfani F; Papadia A; Ceccaroni M; Malzoni M; Pellegrino A; Ferrari F; Greggi S; Uccella S; Pinelli C; Cromi A; Ditto A; Di Martino G; Anchora LP; Falcone F; Bonfiglio F; Odicino F; Mueller M; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F; Landoni F; Ghezzi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 32665147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Efficacy of complications of different surgical treatments in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III].
Zeng SY; Liang MR; Li LY; Wu YY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 20003783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
