These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12368134)
21. Depression and randomized, controlled trials: problems and solutions. Hatcher S Expert Rev Neurother; 2006 Jan; 6(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16466310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Review of randomised trials using the post-randomised consent (Zelen's) design. Adamson J; Cockayne S; Puffer S; Torgerson DJ Contemp Clin Trials; 2006 Aug; 27(4):305-19. PubMed ID: 16455306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Rationale for a non-inferiority clinical trial design focused on subpopulations. Kulkarni PM; Meadows ES; Ahuja S; Muram D; Plouffe L Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Oct; 20(10):1641-7. PubMed ID: 15462697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how? Palmer CR; Shahumyan H Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A new 'mechanistic-practical" framework for designing and interpreting randomized trials. Karanicolas PJ; Montori VM; Devereaux PJ; Schünemann H; Guyatt GH J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 May; 62(5):479-84. PubMed ID: 18468856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What have we learned about randomized, controlled trials in neonatal sepsis? Tarnow-Mordi WO Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2005 May; 6(3 Suppl):S146-9. PubMed ID: 15857549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Conducting research in individual patients: lessons learnt from two series of N-of-1 trials. Wegman AC; van der Windt DA; Stalman WA; de Vries TP BMC Fam Pract; 2006 Sep; 7():54. PubMed ID: 16984636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improving the effectiveness of interventions in palliative care: the potential role of qualitative research in enhancing evidence from randomized controlled trials. Flemming K; Adamson J; Atkin K Palliat Med; 2008 Mar; 22(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18372377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Study control, violators, inclusion criteria and defining explanatory and pragmatic trials. McMahon AD Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1365-76. PubMed ID: 12185890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Selective exclusion of treatment arms in multi-arm randomized clinical trials. Law MG; Emery S Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 12486749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Megatrials are based on a methodological mistake. Charlton BG Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Jul; 46(408):429-31. PubMed ID: 8776917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Meta-analysis or large randomized trial, that is the question]. Pignon JP Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1998 Jan; 22(1):109-10. PubMed ID: 9762182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Commentary: External validity of results of randomized trials: disentangling a complex concept. Rothwell PM Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Feb; 39(1):94-6. PubMed ID: 19776246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Collaborative clinical trials: quality or quantity? Tannock IF Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Feb; 49(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 11173126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A relevant question for site balanced studies relates to the comparative predictability of minimization to the alternative of permuted blocks. McEntegart D Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Nov; 31(6):507. PubMed ID: 20674773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Pilot randomized trials: is there a need? Jeray KJ; Tanner SL J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():15-8. PubMed ID: 22810441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Re-inventing the randomized controlled trial in medical oncology: The registry-based trial. Foroughi S; Wong HL; Gately L; Lee M; Simons K; Tie J; Burgess AW; Gibbs P Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2018 Dec; 14(6):365-373. PubMed ID: 29947051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]