214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12368158)
1. A combination of dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin is less toxic and more effective than high-dose cyclophosphamide for peripheral stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma.
Corso A; Arcaini L; Caberlon S; Zappasodi P; Mangiacavalli S; Lorenzi A; Rusconi C; Troletti D; Maiocchi MA; Pascutto C; Morra E; Lazzarino M
Haematologica; 2002 Oct; 87(10):1041-5. PubMed ID: 12368158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DCEP (dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin) is an effective regimen for peripheral blood stem cell collection in multiple myeloma.
Lazzarino M; Corso A; Barbarano L; Alessandrino EP; Cairoli R; Pinotti G; Ucci G; Uziel L; Rodeghiero F; Fava S; Ferrari D; Fiumanò M; Frigerio G; Isa L; Luraschi A; Montanara S; Morandi S; Perego D; Santagostino A; Savarè M; Vismara A; Morra E
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 Nov; 28(9):835-9. PubMed ID: 11781643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The VAD-DCEP sequence is an effective pre-transplant therapy in untreated multiple myeloma.
Corso A; Barbarano L; Zappasodi P; Cairoli R; Alessandrino EP; Mangiacavalli S; Ferrari D; Fava S; Fiumanò M; Frigerio G; Isa L; Luraschi A; Klersy C; De Paoli A; Vergani C; Banfi L; Perego D; Ucci G; Pinotti G; Savarè M; Uziel L; Vismara A; Morra E; Lazzarino M
Haematologica; 2004 Sep; 89(9):1124-7. PubMed ID: 15377474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy, toxicity and feasibility of a shorter schedule of DCEP regimen for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma.
Corso A; Mangiacavalli S; Nosari A; Castagnola C; Zappasodi P; Cafro AM; Astori C; Bonfichi M; Varettoni M; Rusconi C; Troletti D; Pascutto C; Morra E; Lazzarino M;
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2005 Dec; 36(11):951-4. PubMed ID: 16184179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The VAD chemotherapy regimen plus a G-CSF dose of 10 microg/kg is as effective and less toxic than high-dose cyclophosphamide plus a G-CSF dose of 5 microg/kg for progenitor cell mobilization: results from a monocentric study of 82 patients.
Lefrère F; Zohar S; Ghez D; Delarue R; Audat F; Suarez F; Hermine O; Damaj G; Maillard N; Ribeil JA; Azagury M; Misbahi R; Jondeau K; Cavazzana-Calvo M; Dal Cortivo L; Varet B
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2006 Apr; 37(8):725-9. PubMed ID: 16518433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Superior autologous blood stem cell mobilization from dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin plus G-CSF than from less intensive chemotherapy regimens.
Stewart DA; Guo D; Morris D; Poon MC; Ruether BA; Jones AR; Klassen J; Auer I; Luider J; Chaudhry A; Brown C; Russell JA
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jan; 23(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 10197794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide and cisplatin (DCEP) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients.
Dadacaridou M; Papanicolaou X; Maltesas D; Megalakaki C; Patos P; Panteli K; Repousis P; Mitsouli-Mentzikof C
J BUON; 2007; 12(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 17436400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DCEP chemotherapy followed by a single, fixed dose of pegylated filgrastim allows adequate stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients.
Zappasodi P; Nosari AM; Astori C; Ciapanna D; Bonfichi M; Varettoni M; Mangiacavalli S; Morra E; Lazzarino M; Corso A
Transfusion; 2008 May; 48(5):857-60. PubMed ID: 18248573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ESHAP plus G-CSF as an effective peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization regimen in pretreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison with high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF.
Lee JL; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim EK; Kim SB; Kang YK; Lee J; Kim MW; Park CJ; Chi HS; Huh J; Kim SH; Suh C
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2005 Mar; 35(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 15654353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vinorelbine plus intermediate dose cyclophosphamide is an effective and safe regimen for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma.
Annunziata M; Celentano M; Pocali B; D'Amico MR; Palmieri S; Viola A; Copia C; Falco C; Del Vecchio L; Ferrara F
Ann Hematol; 2006 Jun; 85(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 16538502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-dose cyclophosphamide with or without etoposide for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with multiple myeloma: efficacy and toxicity.
Gojo I; Guo C; Sarkodee-Adoo C; Meisenberg B; Fassas A; Rapoport AP; Cottler-Fox M; Heyman M; Takebe N; Tricot G
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jul; 34(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 15133484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone.
Alegre A; Tomás JF; Martínez-Chamorro C; Gil-Fernández JJ; Fernández-Villalta MJ; Arranz R; Díaz MA; Granda A; Bernardo MR; Escudero A; López-Lorenzo JL; Fernández-Rañada JM
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Aug; 20(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9257889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ESHAP and G-CSF is a superior blood stem cell mobilizing regimen compared to cyclophosphamide 1.5 g m(-2) and G-CSF for pre-treated lymphoma patients: a matched pairs analysis of 78 patients.
Watts MJ; Ings SJ; Leverett D; MacMillan A; Devereux S; Goldstone AH; Linch DC
Br J Cancer; 2000 Jan; 82(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 10646877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dexamethasone, paclitaxel, etoposide, cyclophosphamide (d-TEC) and G-CSF for stem cell mobilisation in multiple myeloma.
Bilgrami S; Bona RD; Edwards RL; Li Z; Naqvi B; Shaikh A; Furlong F; Fox J; Clive J; Tutschka PJ
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 Jul; 28(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 11509931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation as first line treatment of multiple myeloma: an Italian Multicenter Study.
Tribalto M; Amadori S; Cudillo L; Caravita T; Del Poeta G; Meloni G; Avvisati G; Petrucci MT; Pulsoni A; Leone G; Sica S; Martelli M; Tabilio A; Fioritoni G; Majolino I; Mandelli F
Haematologica; 2000 Jan; 85(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 10629592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ifosfamide, epirubicin, and etoposide (IEV) mobilize peripheral blood stem cells more efficiently than cyclophosphamide/etoposide.
Hart C; Blank C; Krause SW; Andreesen R; Hennemann B
Ann Hematol; 2007 Aug; 86(8):575-81. PubMed ID: 17476507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intermediate-dose CY and G-CSF more efficiently mobilize adequate numbers of PBSC for tandem autologous PBSC transplantation compared with low-dose CY in patients with multiple myeloma.
Hiwase DK; Bollard G; Hiwase S; Bailey M; Muirhead J; Schwarer AP
Cytotherapy; 2007; 9(6):539-47. PubMed ID: 17882718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Optimization of mobilization regimes of blood hemopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma].
Pokrovskaia OS; Mendeleeva LP; Urnova ES; Gaponova TV; Gribanova EO; Alekseeva IV; Drokov MIu; Kalinin NN; Gretsov EM; Kliasova GA; Savchenko VG
Ter Arkh; 2011; 83(7):50-7. PubMed ID: 21894752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
