These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12369065)

  • 1. Recognising diversity in public preferences: the use of preference sub-groups in cost-effectiveness analysis. A response to Sculpher and Gafni.
    Robinson A; Parkin D
    Health Econ; 2002 Oct; 11(7):649-51; discussion 653-4. PubMed ID: 12369065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognizing diversity in public preferences: the use of preference sub-groups in cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Sculpher M; Gafni A
    Health Econ; 2001 Jun; 10(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 11400254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The distribution problem in economic evaluation: income and the valuation of costs and consequences of health care programmes.
    Donaldson C; Birch S; Gafni A
    Health Econ; 2002 Jan; 11(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 11788982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can we measure the effectiveness of our organizations?
    Butler T; Kendra J; Grimley R; Taylor B
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 1996; 9(5):37-8. PubMed ID: 10162120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unintended consequences of applying economic evaluation.
    Oliver A
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2002 Jul; 7(3):129-30. PubMed ID: 12171741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic evaluation in health care: is there a role for cost-benefit analysis?
    Johannesson M; Jönsson B
    Health Policy; 1991 Feb; 17(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 10113574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On valuing morbidity, cost-effectiveness analysis, and being rude.
    Kenkel D
    J Health Econ; 1997 Dec; 16(6):749-57. PubMed ID: 10176783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of voice telecommunication services in the NHS.
    Cullingford RG
    Health Estate; 1998 Oct; 52(8):5-7. PubMed ID: 10187088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiency. Measured response.
    Hollingsworth B; Maniadakis N; Thanassoulis E
    Health Serv J; 1999 Nov; 109(5682):28-9. PubMed ID: 11067478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness analysis for health communication programs.
    Guilkey DK; Hutchinson P; Lance P
    J Health Commun; 2006; 11 Suppl 2():47-67. PubMed ID: 17148099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A response to Birch and Gafni--some reasons to be cheerful about NICE.
    Gold M; Bryan S
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2007 Apr; 2(Pt 2):209-16; discussion 217-21. PubMed ID: 18634664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Costing quality.
    Ovretveit J
    Health Serv Manage; 1991 Aug; 87(4):184-5. PubMed ID: 10114062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimising clinical practice to support a sustainable NHS.
    Nicol E
    Clin Med (Lond); 2018 Jun; 18(3):193. PubMed ID: 29858426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Willingness to pay for diagnostic services. A new approach to modelling patient benefits in health care.
    Ried W
    Health Econ; 1994; 3(4):255-66. PubMed ID: 7994325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness studies of behavior change communication campaigns: assessing the state of the science and how to move the field forward.
    Frick KD
    J Health Commun; 2006; 11 Suppl 2():163-73. PubMed ID: 17148104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Editorial comment--stroke cost-effectiveness research: are acceptability curves acceptable?
    Holloway R; Dick AW
    Stroke; 2004 Jan; 35(1):203-4. PubMed ID: 14684768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Open space. Fault lines.
    Wall A
    Health Serv J; 2001 Nov; 111(5782):25. PubMed ID: 11763756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consumer-focused data collection in prevention program evaluation. Rationale and illustrations.
    Spoth R; Molgaard V
    Eval Health Prof; 1993 Sep; 16(3):278-94. PubMed ID: 10128369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating methodologies for assessing the value of information: sifting the evidence.
    Urquhart CJ; Hepworth JB
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1996 Nov; 17(2):45-53. PubMed ID: 10162540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of TQM in primary care: in search of best practice.
    Zairi M; Matthew A
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 1995; 8(6):4-13. PubMed ID: 10165406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.