199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12369067)
1. Decision making heuristics and the elicitation of preferences: being fast and frugal about the future.
Cairns J; van der Pol M; Lloyd A
Health Econ; 2002 Oct; 11(7):655-8. PubMed ID: 12369067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Threats to the estimation of benefit: are preference elicitation methods accurate?
Lloyd AJ
Health Econ; 2003 May; 12(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 12720256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast and frugal food choices: uncovering individual decision heuristics.
Scheibehenne B; Miesler L; Todd PM
Appetite; 2007 Nov; 49(3):578-89. PubMed ID: 17531348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preferences and person trade-offs: forcing consistency or inconsistency in health-related quality of life measures?
Mansley EC; Elbasha EH
Health Econ; 2003 Mar; 12(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 12605464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychological plausibility of the theory of probabilistic mental models and the fast and frugal heuristics.
Dougherty MR; Franco-Watkins AM; Thomas R
Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):199-213. PubMed ID: 18211192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An experiment on simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences.
Maddala T; Phillips KA; Reed Johnson F
Health Econ; 2003 Dec; 12(12):1035-47. PubMed ID: 14673812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A lack of appetite for information and computation. Simple heuristics in food choice.
Schulte-Mecklenbeck M; Sohn M; de Bellis E; Martin N; Hertwig R
Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():242-51. PubMed ID: 23994507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is information always a good thing? Helping patients make "good" decisions.
Ubel PA
Med Care; 2002 Sep; 40(9 Suppl):V39-44. PubMed ID: 12226584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revisiting the axiom of completeness in health care.
Ryan M; San Miguel F
Health Econ; 2003 Apr; 12(4):295-307. PubMed ID: 12652516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consumer preferences for health and nonhealth outcomes of health promotion: results from a discrete choice experiment.
Alayli-Goebbels AF; Dellaert BG; Knox SA; Ament AJ; Lakerveld J; Bot SD; Nijpels G; Severens JL
Value Health; 2013; 16(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 23337222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Principle, strengths and weaknesses of discrete choice modelling for eliciting public preferences for health care].
Berchi C; Launoy G
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2007 Apr; 55(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 17408895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unravelling the concept of consumer preference: implications for health policy and optimal planning in primary care.
Foster MM; Earl PE; Haines TP; Mitchell GK
Health Policy; 2010 Oct; 97(2-3):105-12. PubMed ID: 20466449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Heuristic and linear models of judgment: matching rules and environments.
Hogarth RM; Karelaia N
Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):733-58. PubMed ID: 17638504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient preferences for depression treatment programs and willingness to pay for treatment.
Morey E; Thacher JA; Craighead WE
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2007 Jun; 10(2):73-85. PubMed ID: 17603148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Consumer competencies and the use of comparative quality information: it isn't just about literacy.
Hibbard JH; Peters E; Dixon A; Tusler M
Med Care Res Rev; 2007 Aug; 64(4):379-94. PubMed ID: 17684108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeated follow-up as a method for reducing non-trading behaviour in discrete choice experiments.
Cairns J; van der Pol M
Soc Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 58(11):2211-8. PubMed ID: 15047078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are morally motivated decision makers insensitive to the consequences of their choices?
Bartels DM; Medin DL
Psychol Sci; 2007 Jan; 18(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 17362373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Even swaps: a rational method for making trade-offs.
Hammond JS; Keeney RL; Raiffa H
Harv Bus Rev; 1998; 76(2):137-8, 143-8, 150. PubMed ID: 10177863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best-worst discrete choice experiments in health.
Krucien N; Sicsic J; Ryan M
Health Econ; 2019 Apr; 28(4):572-586. PubMed ID: 30761661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of branding on preference-based decision making.
Philiastides MG; Ratcliff R
Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1208-15. PubMed ID: 23696199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
